From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-19416-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 6324 invoked by alias); 15 Sep 2004 17:49:16 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 6299 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2004 17:49:15 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 15 Sep 2004 17:49:15 -0000
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8FHnEM1001271
	for <gdb@sources.redhat.com>; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 13:49:15 -0400
Received: from localhost.redhat.com (porkchop.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.2])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i8FHn8r05086;
	Wed, 15 Sep 2004 13:49:14 -0400
Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0F4E528D2; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 13:46:57 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <41488010.5080104@gnu.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 17:49:00 -0000
From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-GB; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040831
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: David Lecomber <david@streamline-computing.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: whodunnit?  info sources now returns duplicates
References: <1095243296.24882.5.camel@cpc4-oxfd5-5-0-cust12.oxfd.cable.ntl.com>
In-Reply-To: <1095243296.24882.5.camel@cpc4-oxfd5-5-0-cust12.oxfd.cable.ntl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg00122.txt.bz2

Lets use this to remind ourselves that what we don't test (as in 
gdb/testsuite/) doesn't work.

Andrew

> This is a regression bug -- the version I have tested this are 
> from CVS on 2004-08-17, and 2004-06-22.  
> 
> Any test program:
> 
> foo/test.c
> 
> int main() {
> 	int x;
> }
> 
> now compile - but in the directory above foo.
> 
> gcc -g foo/test.c
> 
> run gdb ./a.out 
> 
> For 20040622, only foo/test.c is listed in info sources (correct)
> For 20040817 (and recent 20040913) foo/test.c and test.c are listed..
> (incorrect)
> 
> When you add a breakpoint to main, and do info sources, the duplicate
> vanishes..