From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@elta.co.il>
To: Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org>
Cc: cagney@gnu.org, drow@false.org,gdb@sources.redhat.com,
mec.gnu@mindspring.com
Subject: Re: Branch created for inter-compilation-unit references
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 05:48:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <uu11ebdbs.fsf@elta.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1037DDEA-67B5-11D8-9146-000A95DA505C@dberlin.org> (message from Daniel Berlin on Wed, 25 Feb 2004 12:07:16 -0500)
> From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org>
> Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 12:07:16 -0500
>
> >
> > A comparison is reasonable (and it isn't ment to degrate SSA or GCC).
> > If the HP merge were to have been handled correctly it would have
> > turned into a project of size and logistics comparable to SSA. That,
> > I think, is getting out of control.
>
> Then you are sorely mistaken.
> If you think the SSA branch is an example of a bad thing, i fear for
> gdb development.
Don't fear.
I think you are reading too much into Andrew's comments, and therefore
miss his point. As I understand what Andrew says, he simply is afraid
that merging large modifications brings a danger of repeating past
mistakes such as the HP merge. I think the point is valid, and we
should be aware of that danger so that the problems don't repeat.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-26 5:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-25 3:51 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-02-25 5:12 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-25 16:10 ` Daniel Berlin
2004-02-25 17:01 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-25 17:07 ` Daniel Berlin
2004-02-25 18:50 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-25 18:53 ` Daniel Berlin
2004-02-25 19:48 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-26 5:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-02-26 6:06 ` Daniel Berlin
2004-02-26 6:31 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-02-26 15:05 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-26 16:19 ` Elena Zannoni
2004-02-26 16:25 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-26 16:36 ` Elena Zannoni
2004-02-26 16:54 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-26 19:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-02-26 19:10 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-02-26 19:24 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-26 19:28 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-26 20:19 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-26 5:48 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-21 20:08 Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-25 0:18 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-25 0:35 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-25 1:29 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-25 2:23 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-25 2:27 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-25 3:17 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=uu11ebdbs.fsf@elta.co.il \
--to=eliz@elta.co.il \
--cc=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=dberlin@dberlin.org \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=mec.gnu@mindspring.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox