From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org>
To: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
Cc: drow@false.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com,
Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec.gnu@mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: Branch created for inter-compilation-unit references
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 18:53:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <F5C691CA-67C3-11D8-9146-000A95DA505C@dberlin.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <403CEE5C.5080100@gnu.org>
On Feb 25, 2004, at 1:50 PM, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>>> the constant schedule slip, ...
>>>
>> tree-ssa was never on a schedule to begin with, so what the heck are
>> you talking about?
>> If you really want to play that card, it wasn't even supposed to be
>> ready before 3.6
>> The fact that it is ready for 3.5 means it certainly hasn't *slipped*.
>
> Er, it was originally, lets say, "hopeing" for 3.4 (or was it 3.3).
Sorry.
This simply isn't true.
Nobody involved thought it would be ready for 3.4.
> Fortunatly the needed resources have now been dedicated to the task.
>
But i thought you said that the branch was consuming too many resources?
You == very bad troll.
--Dan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-25 18:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-25 3:51 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-02-25 5:12 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-25 16:10 ` Daniel Berlin
2004-02-25 17:01 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-25 17:07 ` Daniel Berlin
2004-02-25 18:50 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-25 18:53 ` Daniel Berlin [this message]
2004-02-25 19:48 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-26 5:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-02-26 6:06 ` Daniel Berlin
2004-02-26 6:31 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-02-26 15:05 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-26 16:19 ` Elena Zannoni
2004-02-26 16:25 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-26 16:36 ` Elena Zannoni
2004-02-26 16:54 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-26 19:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-02-26 19:10 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-02-26 19:24 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-26 19:28 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-26 20:19 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-26 5:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-21 20:08 Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-25 0:18 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-25 0:35 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-25 1:29 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-25 2:23 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-25 2:27 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-25 3:17 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=F5C691CA-67C3-11D8-9146-000A95DA505C@dberlin.org \
--to=dberlin@dberlin.org \
--cc=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=mec.gnu@mindspring.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox