From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@elta.co.il>
Cc: Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org>,
cagney@gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com, mec.gnu@mindspring.com
Subject: Re: Branch created for inter-compilation-unit references
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 15:05:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040226150526.GB13921@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <uoermbbdr.fsf@elta.co.il>
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 08:30:56AM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> It's not more important in general, but since we are preparing to cut
> the 6.1 branch in a few days, DW_OP_piece might be a good thing to do
> now, while delaying intercu-branch merge till after the release.
> It's a question of timing, not of an abstract importance.
Then both you and Andrew underestimate the intrusiveness of DW_OP_piece
support. I estimate it will be less total code but considerably more
disruptive, since it will require changes outside of the dwarf2 reader.
Ergo require more testing, more settling time, more review time, et
cetera, and less workable for the branch.
Both of the distributions I maintain GDB for (one for my employer, and
Debian) are facing problems with the size and load time of debug
information. For them, the intercu branch is both more useful and more
urgent. Whether or not it makes GDB 6.1 through the gdb-patches review
process, the GDB 6.1 packages for both of those distributions will
include it.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-26 15:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-25 3:51 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-02-25 5:12 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-25 16:10 ` Daniel Berlin
2004-02-25 17:01 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-25 17:07 ` Daniel Berlin
2004-02-25 18:50 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-25 18:53 ` Daniel Berlin
2004-02-25 19:48 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-26 5:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-02-26 6:06 ` Daniel Berlin
2004-02-26 6:31 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-02-26 15:05 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2004-02-26 16:19 ` Elena Zannoni
2004-02-26 16:25 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-26 16:36 ` Elena Zannoni
2004-02-26 16:54 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-26 19:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-02-26 19:10 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-02-26 19:24 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-26 19:28 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-26 20:19 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-26 5:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-21 20:08 Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-25 0:18 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-25 0:35 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-25 1:29 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-25 2:23 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-25 2:27 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-25 3:17 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040226150526.GB13921@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=dberlin@dberlin.org \
--cc=eliz@elta.co.il \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=mec.gnu@mindspring.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox