* Re: RFA: re-merge dwarf2.h with src [not found] <m3d489ljw4.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> @ 2009-07-10 14:40 ` H.J. Lu 2009-07-10 14:46 ` H.J. Lu 2009-07-10 14:48 ` Tom Tromey 0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: H.J. Lu @ 2009-07-10 14:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: tromey, Binutils, GDB; +Cc: gcc-patches On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Tom Tromey<tromey@redhat.com> wrote: > There was a recent commit to the src copy of dwarf2.h. > This patch pulls it over to the gcc repository. > > Ok? > > Tom > > 2009-07-09 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> > > * dwarf2.h (enum dwarf_location_atom): Add DW_OP_implicit_value > and DW_OP_stack_value. Do we need both dwarf2.h and elf/dwarf2.h? Shouldn't we remove elf/dwarf2h or just include ../dwarf2.h? -- H.J. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: RFA: re-merge dwarf2.h with src 2009-07-10 14:40 ` RFA: re-merge dwarf2.h with src H.J. Lu @ 2009-07-10 14:46 ` H.J. Lu 2009-07-10 14:48 ` Tom Tromey 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: H.J. Lu @ 2009-07-10 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: tromey, Binutils, GDB; +Cc: gcc-patches On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 7:40 AM, H.J. Lu<hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Tom Tromey<tromey@redhat.com> wrote: >> There was a recent commit to the src copy of dwarf2.h. >> This patch pulls it over to the gcc repository. >> >> Ok? >> >> Tom >> >> 2009-07-09 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> >> >> * dwarf2.h (enum dwarf_location_atom): Add DW_OP_implicit_value >> and DW_OP_stack_value. > > Do we need both dwarf2.h and elf/dwarf2.h? Shouldn't we remove elf/dwarf2h > or just include ../dwarf2.h? > > I checked in this patch. Tested binutils on Linux/ia32 and Linux/Intel64. 2009-07-10 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com> * dwarf2.h: Just include ../dwarf2.h. -- H.J. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: RFA: re-merge dwarf2.h with src 2009-07-10 14:40 ` RFA: re-merge dwarf2.h with src H.J. Lu 2009-07-10 14:46 ` H.J. Lu @ 2009-07-10 14:48 ` Tom Tromey 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Tom Tromey @ 2009-07-10 14:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: H.J. Lu; +Cc: Binutils, GDB, gcc-patches >>>>> "H.J." == H J Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> writes: H.J.> Do we need both dwarf2.h and elf/dwarf2.h? Shouldn't we remove elf/dwarf2h H.J.> or just include ../dwarf2.h? Yes, I am going to submit the src patch today. There is only one dwarf2.h in the gcc tree. Tom ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-07-10 14:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <m3d489ljw4.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
2009-07-10 14:40 ` RFA: re-merge dwarf2.h with src H.J. Lu
2009-07-10 14:46 ` H.J. Lu
2009-07-10 14:48 ` Tom Tromey
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox