From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24282 invoked by alias); 10 Jul 2009 14:48:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 24264 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Jul 2009 14:48:24 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:48:21 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n6AEm8Yg021771; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:48:08 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n6AEm7pw030273; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:48:07 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n6AEm6sW001230; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:48:07 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 0167F508291; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 08:48:05 -0600 (MDT) To: "H.J. Lu" Cc: Binutils , GDB , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: RFA: re-merge dwarf2.h with src References: <6dc9ffc80907100740j3ba8add6p11645087ef694b4f@mail.gmail.com> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: Tom Tromey Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:48:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <6dc9ffc80907100740j3ba8add6p11645087ef694b4f@mail.gmail.com> (H. J. Lu's message of "Fri\, 10 Jul 2009 07\:40\:28 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00070.txt.bz2 >>>>> "H.J." == H J Lu writes: H.J.> Do we need both dwarf2.h and elf/dwarf2.h? Shouldn't we remove elf/dwarf2h H.J.> or just include ../dwarf2.h? Yes, I am going to submit the src patch today. There is only one dwarf2.h in the gcc tree. Tom