From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
Cc: markus@hyperion-imrt.org (Markus Alber),
msnyder@vmware.com (Michael Snyder),
gdb@sourceware.org, pedro@codesourcery.com
Subject: Re: performance of multithreading gets gradually worse under gdb
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 22:04:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3oc6sdbc3.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201102032140.p13Le89f031563@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> (Ulrich Weigand's message of "Thu, 3 Feb 2011 22:40:08 +0100 (CET)")
>>>>> "Ulrich" == Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com> writes:
Ulrich> I guess we should just remove the current_regcache = NULL line now.
Yes, it seems so to me as well.
Ulrich> (Actually, now that every thread always has a thread_info, the
Ulrich> best thing would probably be anyway to hang each thread's regcaches
Ulrich> off the thread_info, and do away with the global list completely.)
I suppose in this case, invalidating could simply clear a regcache
instead of deleting (and subsequently recreating) it. Is that correct?
Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-03 22:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-02 20:16 Markus Alber
2011-02-02 20:28 ` Michael Snyder
[not found] ` <76bccf1875854ebc69b6a892fb84a976@hyperion-imrt.org>
2011-02-02 21:43 ` Michael Snyder
2011-02-03 7:03 ` Markus Alber
2011-02-03 20:26 ` Michael Snyder
2011-02-03 20:52 ` Markus Alber
2011-02-03 20:57 ` Tom Tromey
2011-02-03 21:00 ` Tom Tromey
2011-02-03 21:40 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-02-03 22:04 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2011-02-04 13:49 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-02-04 14:55 ` Pedro Alves
2011-02-04 15:13 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-02-04 15:26 ` Tom Tromey
2011-02-04 15:56 ` Pedro Alves
[not found] ` <201102041555.52179.pedro__21913.9744448059$1296834976$gmane$org@codesourcery.com>
2011-02-04 17:02 ` Tom Tromey
2011-02-05 9:34 ` Markus Alber
2011-02-07 14:05 ` Markus Alber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3oc6sdbc3.fsf@fleche.redhat.com \
--to=tromey@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=markus@hyperion-imrt.org \
--cc=msnyder@vmware.com \
--cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
--cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox