From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
To: Markus Alber <markus@hyperion-imrt.org>
Cc: "gdb@sourceware.org" <gdb@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: performance of multithreading gets gradually worse under gdb
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 20:28:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D49BE4E.9000009@vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8b62d2819c94a232987155aa99e01983@hyperion-imrt.org>
Markus Alber wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have experienced the following problem:
>
> I'm debugging a number-crunching application which spawns a lot (36)
> little
> worker threads per iteration. The system does typically OoM 200
> iterations.
> Although each of them should take about the same amount of time, the
> performance
> gets worse with every iteration and becomes excruciatingly slow.
>
> A system monitor reveals that gdb allocates more memory with every
> iteration,
> i.e. with every 36 threads started and finished. The CPU load of GDB
> goes up, too.
> The CPU usage of the application goes down. Compared to the solo
> performance, it
> gets slower by a factor 20 and more, if run long enough.
>
> The application behaves perfectly when run by itself. The
> multi-threaded part is not
> debugging compiled when this behaviour occurs.
>
> The distribution is SuSE 11.3 / gdb 7.1.
>
> Is there anything I can change about this behaviour, any options of gdb
> that need to
> be set in these circumstances?
Interesting.
By how much does gdb's memory allocation increase?
In total or, if possible, per iteration? This might
give is a clue as to where to look.
Do you think you could write a simple sample program that
allocates threads in a manner similar to your application?
Thanks,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-02 20:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-02 20:16 Markus Alber
2011-02-02 20:28 ` Michael Snyder [this message]
[not found] ` <76bccf1875854ebc69b6a892fb84a976@hyperion-imrt.org>
2011-02-02 21:43 ` Michael Snyder
2011-02-03 7:03 ` Markus Alber
2011-02-03 20:26 ` Michael Snyder
2011-02-03 20:52 ` Markus Alber
2011-02-03 20:57 ` Tom Tromey
2011-02-03 21:00 ` Tom Tromey
2011-02-03 21:40 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-02-03 22:04 ` Tom Tromey
2011-02-04 13:49 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-02-04 14:55 ` Pedro Alves
2011-02-04 15:13 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-02-04 15:26 ` Tom Tromey
2011-02-04 15:56 ` Pedro Alves
[not found] ` <201102041555.52179.pedro__21913.9744448059$1296834976$gmane$org@codesourcery.com>
2011-02-04 17:02 ` Tom Tromey
2011-02-05 9:34 ` Markus Alber
2011-02-07 14:05 ` Markus Alber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D49BE4E.9000009@vmware.com \
--to=msnyder@vmware.com \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=markus@hyperion-imrt.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox