Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
To: Markus Alber <markus@hyperion-imrt.org>
Cc: "gdb@sourceware.org" <gdb@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: performance of multithreading gets gradually worse under gdb
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 20:28:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D49BE4E.9000009@vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8b62d2819c94a232987155aa99e01983@hyperion-imrt.org>

Markus Alber wrote:
>  Hello,
> 
>  I have experienced the following problem:
> 
>  I'm debugging a number-crunching application which spawns a lot (36) 
>  little
>  worker threads per iteration. The system does typically OoM 200 
>  iterations.
>  Although each of them should take about the same amount of time, the 
>  performance
>  gets worse with every iteration and becomes excruciatingly slow.
> 
>  A system monitor reveals that gdb allocates more memory with every 
>  iteration,
>  i.e. with every 36 threads started and finished. The CPU load of GDB 
>  goes up, too.
>  The CPU usage of the application goes down. Compared to the solo 
>  performance, it
>  gets slower by a factor 20 and more, if run long enough.
> 
>  The application behaves perfectly when run by itself. The 
>  multi-threaded part is not
>  debugging compiled when this behaviour occurs.
> 
>  The distribution is SuSE 11.3 / gdb 7.1.
> 
>  Is there anything I can change about this behaviour, any options of gdb 
>  that need to
>  be set in these circumstances?

Interesting.

By how much does gdb's memory allocation increase?
In total or, if possible, per iteration?  This might
give is a clue as to where to look.

Do you think you could write a simple sample program that
allocates threads in a manner similar to your application?

Thanks,


  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-02 20:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-02 20:16 Markus Alber
2011-02-02 20:28 ` Michael Snyder [this message]
     [not found]   ` <76bccf1875854ebc69b6a892fb84a976@hyperion-imrt.org>
2011-02-02 21:43     ` Michael Snyder
2011-02-03  7:03       ` Markus Alber
2011-02-03 20:26         ` Michael Snyder
2011-02-03 20:52           ` Markus Alber
2011-02-03 20:57         ` Tom Tromey
2011-02-03 21:00           ` Tom Tromey
2011-02-03 21:40           ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-02-03 22:04             ` Tom Tromey
2011-02-04 13:49               ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-02-04 14:55             ` Pedro Alves
2011-02-04 15:13               ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-02-04 15:26               ` Tom Tromey
2011-02-04 15:56                 ` Pedro Alves
     [not found]                 ` <201102041555.52179.pedro__21913.9744448059$1296834976$gmane$org@codesourcery.com>
2011-02-04 17:02                   ` Tom Tromey
2011-02-05  9:34                     ` Markus Alber
2011-02-07 14:05                     ` Markus Alber

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D49BE4E.9000009@vmware.com \
    --to=msnyder@vmware.com \
    --cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
    --cc=markus@hyperion-imrt.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox