Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
To: Markus Alber <markus@hyperion-imrt.org>
Cc: "gdb@sourceware.org" <gdb@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: performance of multithreading gets gradually worse under gdb
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 20:26:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D4B0F71.1020708@vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0e69c90ce85e34a24a5bcef1ce391aae@hyperion-imrt.org>

Markus Alber wrote:
> 
>  I compiled gdb-6.5 alright and it performs well as usual, without this 
>  problem.

Good info.  What version of gdb were you using when you detected the 
problem?

I ran your program stand-alone, then under gdb 7.0, then gdb 7.2CVS.
On my not-so-new system I got the following times:
stand alone: 15m33s
gdb 7.0      16m
gdb 7.2CVS   16m10s

I could not perceive any change in the cycle time from beginning to end.

GDB 7.0 did increase its memory footprint by about 3mb during the run
(3 percent).  So that could indicate some leakage, around 15k per cycle.
But I can't see that as the main reason for the slow-down you're 
reporting, considering that your system is not memory bound.

GDB 7.2CVS increased its memory footprint by only about 500kb during the
whole run, so you might consider giving that a try.  Instructions for 
getting the latest development sources are here:

http://sourceware.org/gdb/current/

If you'd be willing to contribute your little sample program, we might 
be able to use it for a thread debugging stress test or something.

Michael


  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-03 20:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-02 20:16 Markus Alber
2011-02-02 20:28 ` Michael Snyder
     [not found]   ` <76bccf1875854ebc69b6a892fb84a976@hyperion-imrt.org>
2011-02-02 21:43     ` Michael Snyder
2011-02-03  7:03       ` Markus Alber
2011-02-03 20:26         ` Michael Snyder [this message]
2011-02-03 20:52           ` Markus Alber
2011-02-03 20:57         ` Tom Tromey
2011-02-03 21:00           ` Tom Tromey
2011-02-03 21:40           ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-02-03 22:04             ` Tom Tromey
2011-02-04 13:49               ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-02-04 14:55             ` Pedro Alves
2011-02-04 15:13               ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-02-04 15:26               ` Tom Tromey
2011-02-04 15:56                 ` Pedro Alves
     [not found]                 ` <201102041555.52179.pedro__21913.9744448059$1296834976$gmane$org@codesourcery.com>
2011-02-04 17:02                   ` Tom Tromey
2011-02-05  9:34                     ` Markus Alber
2011-02-07 14:05                     ` Markus Alber

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D4B0F71.1020708@vmware.com \
    --to=msnyder@vmware.com \
    --cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
    --cc=markus@hyperion-imrt.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox