From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@ericsson.com>
Cc: "'Jan Kratochvil'" <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>,
"'gdb\@sourceware.org'" <gdb@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: Using telnet to control a running GDB
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 15:51:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3mxoh8tu2.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F7CE05678329534C957159168FA70DEC572E0C0DE9@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se> (Marc Khouzam's message of "Mon, 6 Dec 2010 21:50:00 -0500")
>>>>> "Marc" == Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@ericsson.com> writes:
Jan> [ You should have more experience with async/non-stop/MI than
Jan> me, though. ]
Marc> We don't always use aync/non-stop in Eclipse. It is up to the
Marc> user to decide.
Tom> I am curious to know why Eclipse works this way.
Marc> From the discussions I have seen about non-stop, it seems some
Marc> user feel the all-stop mode is more intuitive, while others prefer
Marc> non-stop.
Ok, thanks.
I am usually confused about all the modes that gdb supports. Your
explanation of non-stop makes sense to me. This has user-visible
effects and could be "weird", especially if you are used to all-stop.
And, I imagine that the reason for not always using async is just that
it isn't universally supported -- you want to handle older GDB versions,
and even with current GDB I suppose it is not supported by all targets.
Is that the situation?
TBH I think it would be better if we could remove some modes. For
example, if we could make target-async either the default, or enabled
automatically if the user uses some async command.
Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-07 15:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-28 18:28 Marc Khouzam
2010-11-28 22:40 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-11-29 2:56 ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-11-29 15:24 ` Marc Khouzam
2010-11-29 18:55 ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-11-29 20:00 ` Marc Khouzam
2010-11-29 20:39 ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-12-06 18:40 ` Tom Tromey
2010-12-06 18:36 ` Tom Tromey
2010-12-07 2:50 ` Marc Khouzam
2010-12-07 15:51 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2010-12-07 16:13 ` Tristan Gingold
2010-12-07 17:14 ` Marc Khouzam
2010-11-29 21:10 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3mxoh8tu2.fsf@fleche.redhat.com \
--to=tromey@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=marc.khouzam@ericsson.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox