From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@ericsson.com>
Cc: "'gdb@sourceware.org'" <gdb@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: Using telnet to control a running GDB
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 18:55:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101129185524.GA13721@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F7CE05678329534C957159168FA70DEC572E79C43E@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se>
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:24:32 +0100, Marc Khouzam wrote:
> Until that is done, having a telnet session to GDB (if the
> feature already existed) would have been a workaround for the user.
GDB is feature-complete for such "independent session".
If there is a problem implementing it to Eclipse you can just create
a "tee"-like intermediate server:
Eclipse <-MI-> new-server <-MI-> gdb
|
console <-MI-or-CLI-+
|
console <-MI-or-CLI-/
the point is every command sent by new-server -MI-> gdb should finish
immediately due to async/non-stop so any command from "console" can be sent by
new-server -MI-> gdb without any delay.
[ You should have more experience with async/non-stop/MI than me, though. ]
> Although, it would probably make the frontend out-of-sync,
This happens even with current Eclipse GDB Console, for example by modifying
a variable displayed in the Variables window.
> A simple example would be that I setup a debug session using
> GDB and things are not behaving as I expect. I call someone
> to help me look at it. That person would be able to remotely
> connect to my running instance of GDB and start controlling it,
> instead of tell me to 'try this command', 'try that command'.
TBH isn't a VNC session to the full Eclipse GUI more suitable?
Thanks,
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-29 18:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-28 18:28 Marc Khouzam
2010-11-28 22:40 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-11-29 2:56 ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-11-29 15:24 ` Marc Khouzam
2010-11-29 18:55 ` Jan Kratochvil [this message]
2010-11-29 20:00 ` Marc Khouzam
2010-11-29 20:39 ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-12-06 18:40 ` Tom Tromey
2010-12-06 18:36 ` Tom Tromey
2010-12-07 2:50 ` Marc Khouzam
2010-12-07 15:51 ` Tom Tromey
2010-12-07 16:13 ` Tristan Gingold
2010-12-07 17:14 ` Marc Khouzam
2010-11-29 21:10 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101129185524.GA13721@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net \
--to=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=marc.khouzam@ericsson.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox