From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Cc: Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@ericsson.com>,
"'gdb\@sourceware.org'" <gdb@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: Using telnet to control a running GDB
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 18:40:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m31v5ud9tf.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101129203906.GA18241@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> (Jan Kratochvil's message of "Mon, 29 Nov 2010 21:39:06 +0100")
>>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> writes:
Marc> If the console was outside eclipse (like the telnet session,
Marc> I'm mentioning), eclipse may not be able to catch the commands
Marc> from that telnet to be able to parse them, and would then
Marc> fall out-of-sync with GDB.
Jan> MI should rather notify changes done over MI when talking about
Jan> some right way to do it.
I don't think I understand that.
It seems to me that if we want to support a GUI that also has a
gdb-cli-like console, then commands entered at that console should
report both MI and CLI output, so that the GUI can parse the MI
notifications and update other parts of the user interface.
I assume this doesn't work today, but I don't see why it couldn't be
implemented.
I suppose an alternate idea would be to only have MI output and require
the GUI to format it into the console window itself. This seems
somewhat less nice since it means duplicating the formatting code.
Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-06 18:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-28 18:28 Marc Khouzam
2010-11-28 22:40 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-11-29 2:56 ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-11-29 15:24 ` Marc Khouzam
2010-11-29 18:55 ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-11-29 20:00 ` Marc Khouzam
2010-11-29 20:39 ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-12-06 18:40 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2010-12-06 18:36 ` Tom Tromey
2010-12-07 2:50 ` Marc Khouzam
2010-12-07 15:51 ` Tom Tromey
2010-12-07 16:13 ` Tristan Gingold
2010-12-07 17:14 ` Marc Khouzam
2010-11-29 21:10 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m31v5ud9tf.fsf@fleche.redhat.com \
--to=tromey@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=marc.khouzam@ericsson.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox