* 5.2 respin ....
@ 2002-06-02 9:44 Andrew Cagney
2002-06-02 21:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-06-02 9:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb
GDB admin's cron just sent me an e-mail reminding me that a respin is
due soon. Below is a slightly revised version of that mail (cron wanted
to respin with no warning :-( ).
It would be nice to wack some more of the build bug reports.
As for streaching the release cycle to 5 or 6 months, I get the feeling
that GDB's trunk already contains sufficient new features, bug reports
and updated targets to already [almost] justify a new branch :-)
enjoy,
Andrew
----
Hello,
The current GDB branch is scheduled for a respin on or about:
RESPIN: Sun Jun 16 (2002-06-16-gmt)
your local GDB admin.
--
GDB is on a ~4 month (17 week) release cycle.
The current release cycle started Sun May 5 (2002-05-05-gmt).
CURRENT NEXT
Branch: Sun Jul 28 (2002-07-28-gmt) Sun Nov 24 (2002-11-24-gmt)
Release: Sun Sep 1 (2002-09-01-gmt) Sun Dec 29 (2002-12-29-gmt)
reSpin: Sun Oct 13 (2002-10-13-gmt) Sun Feb 9 (2003-02-09-gmt)
The last release was Tue Apr 30 (2002-04-30-gmt), with a respin
scheduled Sun Jun 16 (2002-06-16-gmt).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: 5.2 respin ....
2002-06-02 9:44 5.2 respin Andrew Cagney
@ 2002-06-02 21:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-06-03 5:57 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2002-06-02 21:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: gdb
On Sun, 2 Jun 2002, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> As for streaching the release cycle to 5 or 6 months, I get the feeling
> that GDB's trunk already contains sufficient new features, bug reports
> and updated targets to already [almost] justify a new branch :-)
Can you post a list of the most important changes since 5.2, the ones
that you think warrant a new branch?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: 5.2 respin ....
2002-06-02 21:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2002-06-03 5:57 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-06-03 5:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eli Zaretskii; +Cc: gdb
> On Sun, 2 Jun 2002, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
>
>> As for streaching the release cycle to 5 or 6 months, I get the feeling
>> that GDB's trunk already contains sufficient new features, bug reports
>> and updated targets to already [almost] justify a new branch :-)
>
>
> Can you post a list of the most important changes since 5.2, the ones
> that you think warrant a new branch?
Macro support would be the most visible one. The accumulating list of
C++ and other fixes in the trunk that aren't in the branch. More new
targets.
However, rest assured, I'm not seriously suggesting that a new branch be
cut :-)
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-06-03 12:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-06-02 9:44 5.2 respin Andrew Cagney
2002-06-02 21:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-06-03 5:57 ` Andrew Cagney
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox