From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2553 invoked by alias); 3 Jun 2002 12:57:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2491 invoked from network); 3 Jun 2002 12:57:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 Jun 2002 12:57:55 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 575B23EB4; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 08:58:07 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3CFB67DF.70209@cygnus.com> Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2002 05:57:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0rc3) Gecko/20020530 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: 5.2 respin .... References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-06/txt/msg00021.txt.bz2 > On Sun, 2 Jun 2002, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > >> As for streaching the release cycle to 5 or 6 months, I get the feeling >> that GDB's trunk already contains sufficient new features, bug reports >> and updated targets to already [almost] justify a new branch :-) > > > Can you post a list of the most important changes since 5.2, the ones > that you think warrant a new branch? Macro support would be the most visible one. The accumulating list of C++ and other fixes in the trunk that aren't in the branch. More new targets. However, rest assured, I'm not seriously suggesting that a new branch be cut :-) Andrew