* Building gbd-6.3 together with binutils-2.15 and/or gcc-3.4.3
@ 2004-12-10 14:29 marek.rouchal
2004-12-10 14:31 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: marek.rouchal @ 2004-12-10 14:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb
Dear all,
I am trying to put together a latest&greatest bundle of GNU development
utilities (on RedHat 7.2, RedHat Enterprise 3.0 (Opteron) and Solaris 8
(Sparc)).
I tried to unpack all sources of binutils-2.15, gdb-6.3 and gcc-3.4.3
into the
same root directory and run configure/make bootstrap in there.
However, the gdb-6.3 seems to contain significantly modified common
sources
(esp. in the bfd/ subdirectory), such that this build crashes.
I tried with various combinations of the bfd subdirectories, to no
avail.
Any suggestion you can give? I thought my approach would be a good idea,
since then all utilities would be built on the same basis, but I think I
will
have to go back to compiling gdb separately.
Thanks a lot,
Marek
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Building gbd-6.3 together with binutils-2.15 and/or gcc-3.4.3
2004-12-10 14:29 Building gbd-6.3 together with binutils-2.15 and/or gcc-3.4.3 marek.rouchal
@ 2004-12-10 14:31 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2004-12-10 14:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: marek.rouchal; +Cc: gdb
On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 03:29:43PM +0100, marek.rouchal@infineon.com wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I am trying to put together a latest&greatest bundle of GNU development
> utilities (on RedHat 7.2, RedHat Enterprise 3.0 (Opteron) and Solaris 8
> (Sparc)).
> I tried to unpack all sources of binutils-2.15, gdb-6.3 and gcc-3.4.3
> into the
> same root directory and run configure/make bootstrap in there.
> However, the gdb-6.3 seems to contain significantly modified common
> sources
> (esp. in the bfd/ subdirectory), such that this build crashes.
> I tried with various combinations of the bfd subdirectories, to no
> avail.
>
> Any suggestion you can give? I thought my approach would be a good idea,
> since then all utilities would be built on the same basis, but I think I
> will
> have to go back to compiling gdb separately.
You can't combine trees this way, unless you are using HEAD. GDB does
not contain "modified" common sources; rather, it was released at a
different time.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-12-10 14:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-12-10 14:29 Building gbd-6.3 together with binutils-2.15 and/or gcc-3.4.3 marek.rouchal
2004-12-10 14:31 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox