From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10383 invoked by alias); 10 Dec 2004 14:31:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10346 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2004 14:31:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 10 Dec 2004 14:31:27 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1Cclni-0003JE-Je; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 09:31:18 -0500 Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 14:31:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: marek.rouchal@infineon.com Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Building gbd-6.3 together with binutils-2.15 and/or gcc-3.4.3 Message-ID: <20041210143118.GA12689@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: marek.rouchal@infineon.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-SW-Source: 2004-12/txt/msg00073.txt.bz2 On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 03:29:43PM +0100, marek.rouchal@infineon.com wrote: > Dear all, > > I am trying to put together a latest&greatest bundle of GNU development > utilities (on RedHat 7.2, RedHat Enterprise 3.0 (Opteron) and Solaris 8 > (Sparc)). > I tried to unpack all sources of binutils-2.15, gdb-6.3 and gcc-3.4.3 > into the > same root directory and run configure/make bootstrap in there. > However, the gdb-6.3 seems to contain significantly modified common > sources > (esp. in the bfd/ subdirectory), such that this build crashes. > I tried with various combinations of the bfd subdirectories, to no > avail. > > Any suggestion you can give? I thought my approach would be a good idea, > since then all utilities would be built on the same basis, but I think I > will > have to go back to compiling gdb separately. You can't combine trees this way, unless you are using HEAD. GDB does not contain "modified" common sources; rather, it was released at a different time. -- Daniel Jacobowitz