From: "Smith, Stephen \(SWCOE\)" <Stephen.Smith@honeywell.com>
To: "Daniel Jacobowitz" <drow@false.org>,
"General GDB Mailing List" <gdb@sourceware.org>
Subject: RE: GDB solib interface
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 21:32:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <EF244E26469B2C42B2B72AC465843D6B03E34D5B@AZ18EV808.global.ds.honeywell.com> (raw)
Ok - I am not getting any T stop packets on the gdbserver end. Is there
something I have to do to get gdb to issue them?
The text you wrote:
Reporting DLL events
--------------------
The `T' stop packet response is extended to take three additional
N:R pairs. When any of these are encountered, the stopped thread
is assumed to be at a DLL event. The signal should be SIGTRAP.
There may be multiple load and unload events in the stop packet.
`load:Name=HEXSTR,TextSeg=ADDR,DataSeg=ADDR[,nop]'
A new DLL has been loaded; it is described in the stop packet.
If "nop" is specified, this DLL was already loaded, e.g. by
an earlier call to dlopen.
`unload:IDENTIFIER=VALUE[,nop]'
A DLL has been unloaded. A single identifier is provided to
uniquely identify which DLL has been unloaded. Depending
on the target, this may be the text or data address; the name
can be used, but may not be unambiguous.
If "nop" is specified, this DLL was not unloaded, e.g. because
another thread still had a handle to it.
`dll:dll'
Multiple DLL events have occured. GDB should query the target for
the
current state of DLLs.
next reply other threads:[~2007-01-04 21:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-04 21:32 Smith, Stephen (SWCOE) [this message]
2007-01-04 21:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-01-04 21:46 ` Smith, Stephen (SWCOE)
2007-01-04 21:49 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-01-05 3:39 ` Stephen & Linda Smith
2007-01-05 3:48 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
[not found] ` <EF244E26469B2C42B2B72AC465843D6B03E34F88@AZ18EV808.global.ds.honeywell.com>
2007-01-05 4:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-01-05 19:26 ` Smith, Stephen (SWCOE)
2007-02-07 19:41 ` Smith, Stephen (SWCOE)
2007-02-07 23:57 ` Smith, Stephen (SWCOE)
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-12-04 22:12 Smith, Stephen (SWCOE)
2006-12-04 22:25 ` Michael Snyder
2006-12-04 22:29 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-12-04 22:28 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-12-04 22:48 ` Smith, Stephen (SWCOE)
2006-12-04 23:48 ` Michael Snyder
2006-12-05 2:09 ` Smith, Stephen (SWCOE)
2006-12-05 23:03 ` Smith, Stephen (SWCOE)
2006-12-08 21:19 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-12-08 22:23 ` Smith, Stephen (SWCOE)
2006-12-08 23:21 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-12-15 21:12 ` Smith, Stephen (SWCOE)
2006-12-15 22:39 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-12-17 0:42 ` Smith, Stephen (SWCOE)
2006-12-17 2:16 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-12-17 6:37 ` Stephen & Linda Smith
2006-12-17 15:24 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-12-29 22:08 ` Stephen & Linda Smith
2006-12-29 22:54 ` Stephen & Linda Smith
2007-01-04 20:37 ` Smith, Stephen (SWCOE)
2007-01-04 20:38 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-12-04 21:55 Smith, Stephen (SWCOE)
2006-12-04 21:57 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=EF244E26469B2C42B2B72AC465843D6B03E34D5B@AZ18EV808.global.ds.honeywell.com \
--to=stephen.smith@honeywell.com \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox