From: "Smith, Stephen \(SWCOE\)" <Stephen.Smith@honeywell.com>
To: "Daniel Jacobowitz" <drow@false.org>,
"General GDB Mailing List" <gdb@sourceware.org>
Subject: RE: GDB solib interface
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 00:42:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <EF244E26469B2C42B2B72AC465843D6B03C957DB@AZ18EV808.global.ds.honeywell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061208211922.GA28061@nevyn.them.org>
The function solib_target_relocate_section_addresses() refers to
functions and datamembers that no longer exist. I believe that
borrowing code from the svr4 code is the correct thing to do.
Can anyone confirm that that is the right thing?
-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Jacobowitz [mailto:drow@false.org]
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 2:19 PM
To: Smith, Stephen (SWCOE); General GDB Mailing List
Subject: Re: GDB solib interface
+static void
+solib_target_free_so (struct so_list *so)
+{
+ xfree (so->lm_info);
+}
+
+static void
+solib_target_relocate_section_addresses (struct so_list *so,
+ struct section_table *sec)
+{
+ int flags = bfd_get_section_flags (sec->bfd, sec->the_bfd_section);
+ CORE_ADDR offset;
+
+ offset = symfile_section_offset_from_segment (sec->bfd,
sec->the_bfd_section,
+ so->lm_info->textSeg,
+ so->lm_info->dataSeg);
+
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-17 0:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-04 22:12 Smith, Stephen (SWCOE)
2006-12-04 22:25 ` Michael Snyder
2006-12-04 22:29 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-12-04 22:28 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-12-04 22:48 ` Smith, Stephen (SWCOE)
2006-12-04 23:48 ` Michael Snyder
2006-12-05 2:09 ` Smith, Stephen (SWCOE)
2006-12-05 23:03 ` Smith, Stephen (SWCOE)
2006-12-08 21:19 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-12-08 22:23 ` Smith, Stephen (SWCOE)
2006-12-08 23:21 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-12-15 21:12 ` Smith, Stephen (SWCOE)
2006-12-15 22:39 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-12-17 0:42 ` Smith, Stephen (SWCOE) [this message]
2006-12-17 2:16 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-12-17 6:37 ` Stephen & Linda Smith
2006-12-17 15:24 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-12-29 22:08 ` Stephen & Linda Smith
2006-12-29 22:54 ` Stephen & Linda Smith
2007-01-04 20:37 ` Smith, Stephen (SWCOE)
2007-01-04 20:38 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-01-04 21:32 Smith, Stephen (SWCOE)
2007-01-04 21:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-01-04 21:46 ` Smith, Stephen (SWCOE)
2007-01-04 21:49 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-01-05 3:39 ` Stephen & Linda Smith
2007-01-05 3:48 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
[not found] ` <EF244E26469B2C42B2B72AC465843D6B03E34F88@AZ18EV808.global.ds.honeywell.com>
2007-01-05 4:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-01-05 19:26 ` Smith, Stephen (SWCOE)
2007-02-07 19:41 ` Smith, Stephen (SWCOE)
2007-02-07 23:57 ` Smith, Stephen (SWCOE)
2006-12-04 21:55 Smith, Stephen (SWCOE)
2006-12-04 21:57 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=EF244E26469B2C42B2B72AC465843D6B03C957DB@AZ18EV808.global.ds.honeywell.com \
--to=stephen.smith@honeywell.com \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox