* DejaGnu 1.4.4 release
@ 2004-01-30 10:54 Ben Elliston
2004-02-05 19:34 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ben Elliston @ 2004-01-30 10:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc, gdb, binutils
DejaGnu 1.4.4 has been released.
This release cleans up the source tree, makes a start at overhauling
the documentation, updates to modern versions of build tools like
automake and autoconf and applies patches that have been accumulating
in the sibling source repository at sources.redhat.com.
The hope is that these cleanups will make it easier to start improving
DejaGnu on a wider scale. Feel free to submit suggestions to the
DejaGnu mailing list for improvements.
Major changes from 1.4.2 and 1.4.3:
1. New XML output option, so test results can be loaded into a database.
2. Support for the KFAIL/KPASS (known failures).
3. New "Hello World" example.
4. New tutorial chapter.
5. Test cases build with either GCC 2.x or 3.x.
6. BlueGnu has been removed from the contrib directory.
7. The contrib/test* scipts were bitrotten and have been removed. If
you still want copies of these, they can be found in the previous
DejaGnu release.
8. i960glue.c has been removed.
The source tar file is now available from:
ftp.gnu.org:/pub/gnu/dejagnu/dejagnu-1.4.4.tar.gz
The MD5 checksum of the file is:
MD5 (dejagnu-1.4.4.tar.gz) = 053f18fd5d00873de365413cab17a666
Enjoy!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: DejaGnu 1.4.4 release
2004-01-30 10:54 DejaGnu 1.4.4 release Ben Elliston
@ 2004-02-05 19:34 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-05 20:38 ` Ben Elliston
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2004-02-05 19:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc, gdb, binutils; +Cc: Ben Elliston
[Ben, nice!] Now the questions:
- should src/dejagnu/ be replaced?
- should src/dejagnu/ be removed?
I don't personally care either way (but don't try to sign me up for any
heavy lifting :-).
Andrew
> DejaGnu 1.4.4 has been released.
>
> This release cleans up the source tree, makes a start at overhauling
> the documentation, updates to modern versions of build tools like
> automake and autoconf and applies patches that have been accumulating
> in the sibling source repository at sources.redhat.com.
>
> The hope is that these cleanups will make it easier to start improving
> DejaGnu on a wider scale. Feel free to submit suggestions to the
> DejaGnu mailing list for improvements.
>
> Major changes from 1.4.2 and 1.4.3:
>
> 1. New XML output option, so test results can be loaded into a database.
> 2. Support for the KFAIL/KPASS (known failures).
> 3. New "Hello World" example.
> 4. New tutorial chapter.
> 5. Test cases build with either GCC 2.x or 3.x.
> 6. BlueGnu has been removed from the contrib directory.
> 7. The contrib/test* scipts were bitrotten and have been removed. If
> you still want copies of these, they can be found in the previous
> DejaGnu release.
> 8. i960glue.c has been removed.
>
> The source tar file is now available from:
>
> ftp.gnu.org:/pub/gnu/dejagnu/dejagnu-1.4.4.tar.gz
>
> The MD5 checksum of the file is:
>
> MD5 (dejagnu-1.4.4.tar.gz) = 053f18fd5d00873de365413cab17a666
>
> Enjoy!
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: DejaGnu 1.4.4 release
2004-02-05 19:34 ` Andrew Cagney
@ 2004-02-05 20:38 ` Ben Elliston
2004-02-05 20:50 ` Gerald Pfeifer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ben Elliston @ 2004-02-05 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: gcc, gdb, binutils
Hi Andrew
> - should src/dejagnu/ be replaced?
IMHO, yes. The 1.4.4 release is very close to the version in
src/dejagnu. I've since merged a handful of patches from src -> FSF
that were missed and I've a patch that can be applied after a 1.4.4
import that will ensure that nothing will be lost from src/dejagnu.
> - should src/dejagnu/ be removed?
What would the alternative be? To just expect (ha!) developers to
have DejaGnu installed on their systems?
I think as a first step, we should go with the former. After a bit of
time, we can consider removing it from src altogether.
Cheers, Ben
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: DejaGnu 1.4.4 release
2004-02-05 20:38 ` Ben Elliston
@ 2004-02-05 20:50 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2004-02-05 23:01 ` Joe Buck
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Gerald Pfeifer @ 2004-02-05 20:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ben Elliston; +Cc: Andrew Cagney, gcc, gdb, binutils
On Thu, 6 Feb 2004, Ben Elliston wrote:
>> - should src/dejagnu/ be replaced?
> IMHO, yes. The 1.4.4 release is very close to the version in
> src/dejagnu. I've since merged a handful of patches from src -> FSF
> that were missed and I've a patch that can be applied after a 1.4.4
> import that will ensure that nothing will be lost from src/dejagnu.
Thanks!
>> - should src/dejagnu/ be removed?
> What would the alternative be? To just expect (ha!) developers to
> have DejaGnu installed on their systems?
Yes. If not right away, than in the mid term: we require casual
testers of CVS GCC to have bison and developers to have autoconf
etc.; and if upstream DejaGnu "just works", let's use that.
Most distributions will provide DejaGnu as a package anyway.
Gerald
--
Gerald Pfeifer <gp@suse.de> Technical Project Manager, SUSE Linux AG
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: DejaGnu 1.4.4 release
2004-02-05 20:50 ` Gerald Pfeifer
@ 2004-02-05 23:01 ` Joe Buck
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Joe Buck @ 2004-02-05 23:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gerald Pfeifer; +Cc: Ben Elliston, Andrew Cagney, gcc, gdb, binutils
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 09:47:28PM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Feb 2004, Ben Elliston wrote:
> >> - should src/dejagnu/ be removed?
> > What would the alternative be? To just expect (ha!) developers to
> > have DejaGnu installed on their systems?
The tester population is larger than the developer population.
> Yes. If not right away, than in the mid term: we require casual
> testers of CVS GCC to have bison and developers to have autoconf
> etc.; and if upstream DejaGnu "just works", let's use that.
>
> Most distributions will provide DejaGnu as a package anyway.
We should have a pointer on the web site to the DejaGnu source, for
testers on platforms that don't have it already packaged for them.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: DejaGnu 1.4.4 release
@ 2004-02-01 2:02 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain @ 2004-02-01 2:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: binutils, bje, gcc, gdb
> DejaGnu 1.4.4 has been released.
Works fine for me with the gdb test suite on native i686-pc-linux-gnu
(106 configurations) and native hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 (1 configuration).
Michael C
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: DejaGnu 1.4.4 release
@ 2004-02-05 23:21 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain @ 2004-02-05 23:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: binutils, cagney, gcc, gdb; +Cc: bje
Andrew asks the key questions:
> - should src/dejagnu/ be replaced?
> - should src/dejagnu/ be removed?
My opinion:
Go for removal first. Tell people that the sourceware versions of
Expect and Dejagnu are going away and they need to use the upstream
versions. Provide doco for downloading and building Tcl+Expect+Dejagnu.
(I can do that part).
Wait a month. If no one objects, then kill the sourceware versions
of Expect and Dejagnu.
Michael C
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-02-05 23:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-01-30 10:54 DejaGnu 1.4.4 release Ben Elliston
2004-02-05 19:34 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-05 20:38 ` Ben Elliston
2004-02-05 20:50 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2004-02-05 23:01 ` Joe Buck
2004-02-01 2:02 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-02-05 23:21 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox