From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13687 invoked by alias); 5 Feb 2004 23:21:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13646 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2004 23:21:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO tisch.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.157) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Feb 2004 23:21:40 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by tisch.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1AosoU-0005Ph-00; Thu, 05 Feb 2004 18:21:38 -0500 Received: by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix, from userid 502) id EDEA84B364; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 18:21:52 -0500 (EST) To: binutils@sources.redhat.com, cagney@gnu.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: DejaGnu 1.4.4 release Cc: bje@wasabisystems.com Message-Id: <20040205232152.EDEA84B364@berman.michael-chastain.com> Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 23:21:00 -0000 From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00051.txt.bz2 Andrew asks the key questions: > - should src/dejagnu/ be replaced? > - should src/dejagnu/ be removed? My opinion: Go for removal first. Tell people that the sourceware versions of Expect and Dejagnu are going away and they need to use the upstream versions. Provide doco for downloading and building Tcl+Expect+Dejagnu. (I can do that part). Wait a month. If no one objects, then kill the sourceware versions of Expect and Dejagnu. Michael C