From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
To: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
"Will Deacon" <will.deacon@arm.com>,
"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"Zhang Lei" <zhang.lei@jp.fujitsu.com>,
"Alan Hayward" <alan.hayward@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] arm64/sve: Fix missing SVE/FPSIMD endianness conversions
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 17:46:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <771b0099-9217-4e55-b73a-b03434c61655@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1560355234-25516-2-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Hi Dave,
On 12/06/2019 17:00, Dave Martin wrote:
> The in-memory representation of SVE and FPSIMD registers is
> different: the FPSIMD V-registers are stored as single 128-bit
> host-endian values, whereas SVE registers are stored in an
> endianness-invariant byte order.
>
> This means that the two representations differ when running on a
> big-endian host. But we blindly copy data from one representation
> to another when converting between the two, resulting in the
> register contents being unintentionally byteswapped in certain
> situations. Currently this can be triggered by the first SVE
> instruction after a syscall, for example (though the potential
> trigger points may vary in future).
>
> So, fix the conversion functions fpsimd_to_sve(), sve_to_fpsimd()
> and sve_sync_from_fpsimd_zeropad() to swab where appropriate.
>
> There is no common swahl128() or swab128() that we could use here.
> Maybe it would be worth making this generic, but for now add a
> simple local hack.
>
> Since the byte order differences are exposed in ABI, also clarify
> the docuentation.
NIT: s/docuentation/documentation/
Although, it is probably too late to fix this one as Will already took the patch.
[...]
> diff --git a/Documentation/arm64/sve.txt b/Documentation/arm64/sve.txt
> index 9940e92..6c0bed3 100644
> --- a/Documentation/arm64/sve.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/arm64/sve.txt
> @@ -56,6 +56,18 @@ model features for SVE is included in Appendix A.
> is to connect to a target process first and then attempt a
> ptrace(PTRACE_GETREGSET, pid, NT_ARM_SVE, &iov).
>
> +* Whenever SVE scalable register values (Zn, Pn, FFR) are exchanged in memory
> + between userspace and the kernel, the register value is encoded in memory in
> + an endianness-invariant layout, with bits [(8 * i + 7) : (8 * i)] encoded at
> + byte offset i in from the start of the memory representation. This affects
> + for example the signal frame (struct sve_context) and ptrace interface
> + (struct user_sve_header) and associated data.
> +
> + Beware that on big-endian systems this results in a different byte order than
> + for the FPSIMD V-registers, which are stored as single host-endian 128-bit
> + values, with bits [(127 - 8 * i) : (120 - 8 * i)] of the register encoded at
> + byte offset i. (struct fpsimd_context, struct user_fpsimd_state).
> +
>
> 2. Vector length terminology
> -----------------------------
> @@ -124,6 +136,10 @@ the SVE instruction set architecture.
> size and layout. Macros SVE_SIG_* are defined [1] to facilitate access to
> the members.
>
> +* Each scalable register (Zn, Pn, FFR) is stored in an endianness-invariant
> + layout, with bits [(8 * i + 7) : (8 * i)] stored at byte offset i from the
> + start of the register's representation in memory.
> +
> * If the SVE context is too big to fit in sigcontext.__reserved[], then extra
> space is allocated on the stack, an extra_context record is written in
> __reserved[] referencing this space. sve_context is then written in the
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> index 7b7ac0f..072ea1e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> @@ -260,6 +260,13 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_events {
> KVM_REG_SIZE_U256 | \
> ((i) & (KVM_ARM64_SVE_MAX_SLICES - 1)))
>
> +/*
> + * Register values for KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_ZREG(), KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_PREG() and
> + * KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_FFR() and represented in memory in an endianness-
NIT: s/and represented/are represented/ I think.
> + * invariant layout which differs from the layout used for the FPSIMD
> + * V-registers on big-endian systems: see sigcontext.h for more explanaion.
NIT: s/explanaion/explanation/
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-12 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-12 16:00 [PATCH v2 0/3] arm64/sve: Fix mutating register endianness on big-endian Dave Martin
2019-06-12 16:01 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] arm64/sve: Fix missing SVE/FPSIMD endianness conversions Dave Martin
2019-06-12 17:29 ` Will Deacon
2019-06-12 17:46 ` Julien Grall [this message]
2019-06-13 10:00 ` Dave Martin
2019-06-13 10:17 ` Will Deacon
2019-06-13 10:20 ` Dave Martin
2019-06-12 16:01 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] arm64/sve: Factor out FPSIMD to SVE state conversion Dave Martin
2019-06-20 13:45 ` Julien Grall
2019-07-22 10:31 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-12 16:01 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64/sve: Fix a couple of magic numbers for the Z-reg count Dave Martin
2019-06-20 13:43 ` Julien Grall
2019-07-22 10:32 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=771b0099-9217-4e55-b73a-b03434c61655@arm.com \
--to=julien.grall@arm.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=alan.hayward@arm.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=zhang.lei@jp.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox