Closed bugs with no resolution in the 'gdb' product

Closed bugs with no resolution in the 'gdb' product

[Frédéric Buclin]

Hello all,

I just found that 19 bugs are CLOSED but have no resolution, making
Bugzilla to complain. In order to upgrade correctly to Bugzilla 3.6.2, I
need these bugs to have a valid resolution, or be reopened. All these
bugs are in the 'gdb' product:

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_id=7321,7893,7986,7987,7988,8038,8039,8040,8213,8342,8359,8385,8586,8816,9087,9088,9445,9468,9596

Could one of you triage them and set the resolution accordingly?


Many thanks,

Frédéric Buclin

Re: Closed bugs with no resolution in the 'gdb' product

[Andreas Schwab]

Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit@netscape.net> writes:

> I just found that 19 bugs are CLOSED but have no resolution, making
> Bugzilla to complain. In order to upgrade correctly to Bugzilla 3.6.2, I
> need these bugs to have a valid resolution, or be reopened. All these
> bugs are in the 'gdb' product:
>
> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_id=7321,7893,7986,7987,7988,8038,8039,8040,8213,8342,8359,8385,8586,8816,9087,9088,9445,9468,9596
>
> Could one of you triage them and set the resolution accordingly?

Looks like they should all be resolved as duplicates of some other bug.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."

Re: Closed bugs with no resolution in the 'gdb' product

[Frédéric Buclin]

Le 26. 09. 10 01:37, Andreas Schwab a écrit :
>> Could one of you triage them and set the resolution accordingly?
> 
> Looks like they should all be resolved as duplicates of some other bug.

The problem is: which other bugs? They all come from Gnats, and that's
probably why the resolution is broken. And assuming the bugs they
pointed to are not in the DB, what should we do with them?

Frédéric

Re: Closed bugs with no resolution in the 'gdb' product

[Joel Brobecker]

> The problem is: which other bugs? They all come from Gnats, and that's
> probably why the resolution is broken. And assuming the bugs they
> pointed to are not in the DB, what should we do with them?

They should be in the DB (AFAIK, all PRs were carried over during
the transition). Do you have the old GNATS PRs? We can compute
the new PR numbers using: PR-bugzilla = PR-gnats + 7105.

-- 
Joel

Re: Closed bugs with no resolution in the 'gdb' product

[Frédéric Buclin]

Le 26. 09. 10 01:56, Joel Brobecker a écrit :
> Do you have the old GNATS PRs? We can compute
> the new PR numbers using: PR-bugzilla = PR-gnats + 7105.

Those marked as duplicate do not have the bug ID in the comment, so I
don't know where they should point to. And there are several bugs with:

State-Changed-Why: pr gdb/NNN is a premature version of pr gdb/MMM.

Does it mean such bugs should be closed as INVALID?

Re: Closed bugs with no resolution in the 'gdb' product

[Frédéric Buclin]

Le 26. 09. 10 01:56, Joel Brobecker a écrit :
> the new PR numbers using: PR-bugzilla = PR-gnats + 7105.

I finally managed to guess the bug ID for most of them. Most of the
time, the same bug was filed several times in a row. So I just had to
look at the previous bug (bug N-1), and it was indeed the same one. :)

This leaves us with bug 7321 only, which I have no idea where the
duplicate is.

Re: Closed bugs with no resolution in the 'gdb' product

[Matt Rice]

2010/9/26 Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit@netscape.net>:
> Le 26. 09. 10 01:56, Joel Brobecker a écrit :
>> the new PR numbers using: PR-bugzilla = PR-gnats + 7105.
>
> I finally managed to guess the bug ID for most of them. Most of the
> time, the same bug was filed several times in a row. So I just had to
> look at the previous bug (bug N-1), and it was indeed the same one. :)
>
> This leaves us with bug 7321 only, which I have no idea where the
> duplicate is.
>

looks like its N+1
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7322