From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31614 invoked by alias); 26 Sep 2010 12:45:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 31603 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Sep 2010 12:45:46 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from imr-da06.mx.aol.com (HELO imr-da06.mx.aol.com) (205.188.169.203) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 12:45:42 +0000 Received: from mtaout-da06.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaout-da06.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.51.134]) by imr-da06.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o8QCii89011586; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 08:44:48 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.2] (204.74.63.81.cust.bluewin.ch [81.63.74.204]) by mtaout-da06.r1000.mx.aol.com (MUA/Third Party Client Interface) with ESMTPA id D9ED1E0000BD; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 08:44:47 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4C9F403E.30804@netscape.net> Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 12:45:00 -0000 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_Buclin?= Reply-To: LpSolit@netscape.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fr; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker CC: Andreas Schwab , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Closed bugs with no resolution in the 'gdb' product References: <4C9E6B57.8030509@netscape.net> <4C9E8950.2050808@netscape.net> <20100925235622.GP3044@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20100925235622.GP3044@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:427638688:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d33864c9f403f005a X-AOL-IP: 81.63.74.204 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-09/txt/msg00141.txt.bz2 Le 26. 09. 10 01:56, Joel Brobecker a écrit : > Do you have the old GNATS PRs? We can compute > the new PR numbers using: PR-bugzilla = PR-gnats + 7105. Those marked as duplicate do not have the bug ID in the comment, so I don't know where they should point to. And there are several bugs with: State-Changed-Why: pr gdb/NNN is a premature version of pr gdb/MMM. Does it mean such bugs should be closed as INVALID?