From: Stan Shebs <stan@codesourcery.com>
To: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
Cc: Jakob Engblom <jakob@virtutech.com>,
'Stan Shebs' <stan@codesourcery.com>,
"gdb@sourceware.org" <gdb@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: Tracepoint enhancements
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 21:37:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4910C062.4040404@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <490F4DDD.3040407@vmware.com>
Michael Snyder wrote:
> [...] a checkpoint
> represents a machine state. If there are multiple machines,
> that complicates the picture -- but basically gdb is saying
> to the target "I want to be able to return to the state that
> you are in *right now*".
Hmm, that is a significant wrinkle to the execution history theory.
Basically it's not possible to know reliably whether the execution state
of one CPU comes sooner or later than the state of another CPU - their
clocks can't be guaranteed to be sync'ed to a sub-instruction level.
It's a little like a distributed version control system, where each
repository has its own version numbers, and any ordering derives from
explicit push/pull instructions. Each inferior can have a reliable
execution history, but if you want to go back to state X on CPU 1, you
either just affect the one inferior, or expect that other inferiors will
go back to the closest available state in their histories.
Stan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-04 21:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-31 20:46 Stan Shebs
[not found] ` <490B6CEF.2000003@vmware.com>
2008-11-01 8:40 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-11-03 18:20 ` Michael Snyder
2008-11-04 21:17 ` Stan Shebs
2008-11-05 7:14 ` Vladimir Prus
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.58.0811060523150.8468@vlab.hofr.at>
2008-11-06 18:19 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-11-03 6:38 ` Jakob Engblom
2008-11-03 18:27 ` Michael Snyder
2008-11-03 18:53 ` Jakob Engblom
2008-11-03 19:23 ` Michael Snyder
2008-11-04 14:00 ` Jakob Engblom
2008-11-04 21:37 ` Stan Shebs [this message]
2008-11-04 21:58 ` Michael Snyder
2008-11-05 9:04 ` Jakob Engblom
2008-11-03 9:12 ` Jeremy Bennett
2008-11-04 21:26 ` Stan Shebs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4910C062.4040404@codesourcery.com \
--to=stan@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=jakob@virtutech.com \
--cc=msnyder@vmware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox