From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Pending breakpoints and scripts
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 14:31:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <402A3CBB.1060508@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040210222616.GA32636@nevyn.them.org>
>> >I'd rather not reverse the question. We could check from_tty at the
>> >call site, and not set pending breakpoints if no tty...
>
>>
>> Why?
>
>
> Well, how would you word it? It makes more intuitive sense to me to
> answer 'y' to create something special and 'n' to do nothing, than the
> other way around.
Something like:
"Discard breakpoint, rather than mark it pending?"
is a guess.
The real problem here is with batch scripts, the change breaks existing
script behavior (which is never a good thing).
How about this, we introduce:
nquery()
yquery()
where the default (batch mode, and when return is pressed is n/y
respectively). We'd need the language police to look over the interface
but should otherwize be ok.
Andrew
PS: There's a GUI bug here also. The query doesn't contain the error
message (cf my recent change to internal-error where I made certain each
query contained the full context of the question).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-11 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-09 20:02 Andrew Cagney
2004-02-09 22:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-10 21:22 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-10 22:26 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-11 3:48 ` System calls debugging MuthuKumar-Hotpop
2004-02-12 9:58 ` how to include subdirectories too, for the source directory murugesan
2004-02-12 13:07 ` Bob Rossi
2004-02-13 4:23 ` murugesan
2004-02-11 14:31 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2004-02-11 14:47 ` Pending breakpoints and scripts Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-17 19:24 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-17 19:31 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-17 19:39 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-17 19:41 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-17 20:07 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-02-17 20:14 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-17 20:15 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-17 20:13 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-17 20:15 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-17 20:30 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-17 20:35 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-19 22:42 ` [RFA]: Patch for pending " Jeff Johnston
2004-02-23 15:56 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-09 22:27 Pending " Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-02-09 22:38 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=402A3CBB.1060508@gnu.org \
--to=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox