Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Pending breakpoints and scripts
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 20:02:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4027E74B.6090805@gnu.org> (raw)

Anyone noticed this?

(top-gdb) run testsuite/gdb.base/advance
Starting program: ...
Setting up the environment for debugging gdb.
Function "internal_error" not defined.
Breakpoint 1 (internal_error) pending.
Function "info_command" not defined.
Breakpoint 2 (info_command) pending.
(top-gdb)

It's caused by this:

           if (!query ("Make breakpoint pending on future shared library 
load? ")
)
             return rc;

The old behavior was: when in batch mode, throw an error (and hence 
abandon the script) if the breakpoint insert fails.

The new behavior is: when in batch mode, always insert the breakpoint. 
when not in batch mode never throw an error.

For the existing behavior to be restored the query's logic would need to 
be reversed (ask the oposite question) and then re-throw the error.  A 
/pending qualifier could then be added.

Thoughts?
Andrew


             reply	other threads:[~2004-02-09 20:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-02-09 20:02 Andrew Cagney [this message]
2004-02-09 22:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-10 21:22   ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-10 22:26     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-11  3:48       ` System calls debugging MuthuKumar-Hotpop
2004-02-12  9:58         ` how to include subdirectories too, for the source directory murugesan
2004-02-12 13:07           ` Bob Rossi
2004-02-13  4:23             ` murugesan
2004-02-11 14:31       ` Pending breakpoints and scripts Andrew Cagney
2004-02-11 14:47         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-17 19:24           ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-17 19:31             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-17 19:39               ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-17 19:41                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-17 20:07                   ` Jeff Johnston
2004-02-17 20:14                     ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-17 20:15                       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-17 20:13                   ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-17 20:15                     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-17 20:30                       ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-17 20:35                         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-19 22:42           ` [RFA]: Patch for pending " Jeff Johnston
2004-02-23 15:56             ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-09 22:27 Pending " Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-02-09 22:38 ` Andrew Cagney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4027E74B.6090805@gnu.org \
    --to=cagney@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox