Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Pending breakpoints and scripts
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 22:32:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040209223227.GA7344@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4027E74B.6090805@gnu.org>

On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 03:02:19PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> Anyone noticed this?
> 
> (top-gdb) run testsuite/gdb.base/advance
> Starting program: ...
> Setting up the environment for debugging gdb.
> Function "internal_error" not defined.
> Breakpoint 1 (internal_error) pending.
> Function "info_command" not defined.
> Breakpoint 2 (info_command) pending.
> (top-gdb)
> 
> It's caused by this:
> 
>           if (!query ("Make breakpoint pending on future shared library 
> load? ")
> )
>             return rc;
> 
> The old behavior was: when in batch mode, throw an error (and hence 
> abandon the script) if the breakpoint insert fails.
> 
> The new behavior is: when in batch mode, always insert the breakpoint. 
> when not in batch mode never throw an error.
> 
> For the existing behavior to be restored the query's logic would need to 
> be reversed (ask the oposite question) and then re-throw the error.  A 
> /pending qualifier could then be added.
> 
> Thoughts?

I'd rather not reverse the question.  We could check from_tty at the
call site, and not set pending breakpoints if no tty...

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer


  reply	other threads:[~2004-02-09 22:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-02-09 20:02 Andrew Cagney
2004-02-09 22:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2004-02-10 21:22   ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-10 22:26     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-11  3:48       ` System calls debugging MuthuKumar-Hotpop
2004-02-12  9:58         ` how to include subdirectories too, for the source directory murugesan
2004-02-12 13:07           ` Bob Rossi
2004-02-13  4:23             ` murugesan
2004-02-11 14:31       ` Pending breakpoints and scripts Andrew Cagney
2004-02-11 14:47         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-17 19:24           ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-17 19:31             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-17 19:39               ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-17 19:41                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-17 20:07                   ` Jeff Johnston
2004-02-17 20:14                     ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-17 20:15                       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-17 20:13                   ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-17 20:15                     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-17 20:30                       ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-17 20:35                         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-19 22:42           ` [RFA]: Patch for pending " Jeff Johnston
2004-02-23 15:56             ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-09 22:27 Pending " Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-02-09 22:38 ` Andrew Cagney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040209223227.GA7344@nevyn.them.org \
    --to=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox