* Follow fork testcases?
@ 2003-10-11 20:55 Andrew Cagney
2003-10-11 22:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2003-10-11 20:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Jacobowitz, gdb
Daniel,
Should these be enabled? Do they work?
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Follow fork testcases?
2003-10-11 20:55 Follow fork testcases? Andrew Cagney
@ 2003-10-11 22:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2003-10-11 22:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 04:55:14PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> Daniel,
>
> Should these be enabled? Do they work?
Follow-fork.exp works with some output changes. I haven't gotten
around to it yet because I want to test the updated tests on HP/UX.
It's on my TODO still.
Follow-vfork does not work because it also uses follow-exec
functionality. I need to ask for some comments on how following execs
SHOULD work, since the way it DOES work is somewhat dodgy. That's also
on my TODO list.
Thanks for the reminder.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-10-11 22:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-10-11 20:55 Follow fork testcases? Andrew Cagney
2003-10-11 22:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox