From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9193 invoked by alias); 11 Oct 2003 22:17:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9182 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2003 22:17:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Oct 2003 22:17:51 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.24 #1 (Debian)) id 1A8S3a-0001sp-Rj for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2003 18:17:50 -0400 Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 22:17:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Follow fork testcases? Message-ID: <20031011221750.GA7209@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <3F886E32.3080900@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3F886E32.3080900@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00185.txt.bz2 On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 04:55:14PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > Daniel, > > Should these be enabled? Do they work? Follow-fork.exp works with some output changes. I haven't gotten around to it yet because I want to test the updated tests on HP/UX. It's on my TODO still. Follow-vfork does not work because it also uses follow-exec functionality. I need to ask for some comments on how following execs SHOULD work, since the way it DOES work is somewhat dodgy. That's also on my TODO list. Thanks for the reminder. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer