Re: Why does solib_open do what it does?

[Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>]

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 01:11:38PM -0700, Michael Snyder wrote:
> 
>>Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 11:41:02AM -0700, Michael Snyder wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>You don't think that gdb should honor LD_LIBRARY_PATH in native
>>>>debugging, if it is set?  Won't the linker-loader honor it?
>>>>
>>>>I'd be ready to agree that, if solib-search-path is set,
>>>>it should override LD_LIBRARY_PATH.  But if it isn't set...
>>>
>>>
>>>As far as I'm concerned, the linker should always set the absolute
>>>pathname, and we shouldn't be doing any of this junk. 
>>
>>Well, but that is not in fact the case.  For sure not on linux,
>>and I don't think it is on solaris either.
> 
> 
> In Linux it's the case for all searched-for objects, as far as I know -
> anything found via search paths, LD_LIBRARY_PATH, DT_RUNPATH, DT_RPATH,
> etc. will either be an absolute path or else contain slashes and be
> relative to the current directory.  If it's not true for dlopen'd
> objects, well, there's no way to know where the app had chdir'd to when
> it loaded them.
> 
> Do you know offhand when it's not true for GNU/Linux?

No, I just recall that, several years ago when I worked on this code,
it was not always true.