From: "Kris Warkentin" <kewarken@qnx.com>
To: "Michael Snyder" <msnyder@redhat.com>,
"Kevin Buettner" <kevinb@redhat.com>
Cc: "Daniel Jacobowitz" <drow@mvista.com>,
"Gdb@Sources.Redhat.Com" <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Why does solib_open do what it does?
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 01:43:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <005101c3353c$80077c70$2a00a8c0@dash> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3EEFAEDB.4090509@redhat.com>
> > Michael, any comments?
>
> I don't remember. ;-(
> I'll just remark that ld puts full paths in for some libs, and not for
others.
> That's why there are two variables, SOLIB-SEARCH-PATH and
> SOLIB-ABSOLUTE-PREFIX. One is the prefix that goes before everything
> (even rooted filespecs), and the other is the additional prefix that
> goes before an un-rooted filespec.
Okay then, here's what I propose.
1) Change the order as Kevin suggested earlier. This give the user plenty
of opportunity to tell gdb how to find the solibs before we thrash about
desperately in LD_LIBRARY_PATH, etc.
2) Take out the solib_search_path check in the if(found_file <0 &&
solib_search_path != NULL) parts of the last two desperation plays. I don't
think there's any reason for them.
I have a feeling that we want to leave the last two searches in place simply
because native debugging is the most common and they probably catch a lot of
action. Most people doing remote debugging are setting up their
solib-absolute-prefix and such properly anyway.
Sound reasonable?
cheers,
Kris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-18 1:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-17 19:01 Kris Warkentin
2003-06-17 19:13 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-06-17 19:14 ` Kris Warkentin
2003-06-17 19:37 ` Elena Zannoni
2003-06-17 19:47 ` Kris Warkentin
2003-06-17 20:01 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-06-17 20:15 ` Kris Warkentin
2003-06-17 20:24 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-06-18 0:14 ` Michael Snyder
2003-06-18 1:43 ` Kris Warkentin [this message]
2003-06-18 5:33 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-06-18 12:11 ` Kris Warkentin
2003-06-18 15:07 ` Kris Warkentin
2003-06-18 18:52 ` Michael Snyder
2003-06-18 19:09 ` Kris Warkentin
2003-06-18 19:20 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-06-18 20:10 ` Michael Snyder
2003-06-18 20:17 ` Kris Warkentin
2003-06-18 19:14 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-06-18 18:45 ` Michael Snyder
2003-06-18 18:41 ` Michael Snyder
2003-06-18 19:16 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-06-18 20:11 ` Michael Snyder
2003-06-18 20:19 ` Kris Warkentin
2003-06-18 20:27 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-06-18 20:51 ` Michael Snyder
2003-06-19 12:24 ` Kris Warkentin
2003-06-19 23:33 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-06-20 0:02 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-06-20 12:28 ` Kris Warkentin
2003-06-20 12:43 ` Kevin Buettner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='005101c3353c$80077c70$2a00a8c0@dash' \
--to=kewarken@qnx.com \
--cc=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=kevinb@redhat.com \
--cc=msnyder@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox