Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kris Warkentin" <kewarken@qnx.com>
To: "Michael Snyder" <msnyder@redhat.com>,
	"Kevin Buettner" <kevinb@redhat.com>
Cc: "Daniel Jacobowitz" <drow@mvista.com>,
	"Gdb@Sources.Redhat.Com" <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Why does solib_open do what it does?
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 01:43:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <005101c3353c$80077c70$2a00a8c0@dash> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3EEFAEDB.4090509@redhat.com>

> > Michael, any comments?
>
> I don't remember.  ;-(
> I'll just remark that ld puts full paths in for some libs, and not for
others.
> That's why there are two variables, SOLIB-SEARCH-PATH and
> SOLIB-ABSOLUTE-PREFIX.  One is the prefix that goes before everything
> (even rooted filespecs), and the other is the additional prefix that
> goes before an un-rooted filespec.

Okay then, here's what I propose.

1) Change the order as Kevin suggested earlier.  This give the user plenty
of opportunity to tell gdb how to find the solibs before we thrash about
desperately in LD_LIBRARY_PATH, etc.

2) Take out the solib_search_path check in the if(found_file <0 &&
solib_search_path != NULL) parts of the last two desperation plays.  I don't
think there's any reason for them.

I have a feeling that we want to leave the last two searches in place simply
because native debugging is the most common and they probably catch a lot of
action.  Most people doing remote debugging are setting up their
solib-absolute-prefix and such properly anyway.

Sound reasonable?

cheers,

Kris


  reply	other threads:[~2003-06-18  1:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-06-17 19:01 Kris Warkentin
2003-06-17 19:13 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-06-17 19:14   ` Kris Warkentin
2003-06-17 19:37     ` Elena Zannoni
2003-06-17 19:47       ` Kris Warkentin
2003-06-17 20:01     ` Kevin Buettner
2003-06-17 20:15       ` Kris Warkentin
2003-06-17 20:24         ` Kevin Buettner
2003-06-18  0:14           ` Michael Snyder
2003-06-18  1:43             ` Kris Warkentin [this message]
2003-06-18  5:33               ` Kevin Buettner
2003-06-18 12:11                 ` Kris Warkentin
2003-06-18 15:07                   ` Kris Warkentin
2003-06-18 18:52                     ` Michael Snyder
2003-06-18 19:09                       ` Kris Warkentin
2003-06-18 19:20                         ` Andrew Cagney
2003-06-18 20:10                         ` Michael Snyder
2003-06-18 20:17                           ` Kris Warkentin
2003-06-18 19:14                       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-06-18 18:45                   ` Michael Snyder
2003-06-18 18:41                 ` Michael Snyder
2003-06-18 19:16                   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-06-18 20:11                     ` Michael Snyder
2003-06-18 20:19                       ` Kris Warkentin
2003-06-18 20:27                       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-06-18 20:51                         ` Michael Snyder
2003-06-19 12:24                           ` Kris Warkentin
2003-06-19 23:33                             ` Kevin Buettner
2003-06-20  0:02                               ` Kevin Buettner
2003-06-20 12:28                                 ` Kris Warkentin
2003-06-20 12:43                                   ` Kevin Buettner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='005101c3353c$80077c70$2a00a8c0@dash' \
    --to=kewarken@qnx.com \
    --cc=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=kevinb@redhat.com \
    --cc=msnyder@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox