From: "Kris Warkentin" <kewarken@qnx.com>
To: "Michael Snyder" <msnyder@redhat.com>,
"Daniel Jacobowitz" <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: "Kevin Buettner" <kevinb@redhat.com>,
"Gdb@Sources.Redhat.Com" <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Why does solib_open do what it does?
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 12:24:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <046901c3365d$c68e2a50$0202040a@catdog> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3EF0D0AD.6000204@redhat.com>
> > In Linux it's the case for all searched-for objects, as far as I know -
> > anything found via search paths, LD_LIBRARY_PATH, DT_RUNPATH, DT_RPATH,
> > etc. will either be an absolute path or else contain slashes and be
> > relative to the current directory. If it's not true for dlopen'd
> > objects, well, there's no way to know where the app had chdir'd to when
> > it loaded them.
> >
> > Do you know offhand when it's not true for GNU/Linux?
>
> No, I just recall that, several years ago when I worked on this code,
> it was not always true.
Okay gentlemen, all kidding aside, what do we do? At the bare minimum I
believe the test
/* If not found, next search the inferior's $PATH environment variable. */
if (found_file < 0 && solib_search_path != NULL)
should be just:
if (found_file < 0).
We can always make a decision about removing the PATH and LD_LIBRARY_PATH
checks later.
cheers,
Kris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-19 12:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-17 19:01 Kris Warkentin
2003-06-17 19:13 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-06-17 19:14 ` Kris Warkentin
2003-06-17 19:37 ` Elena Zannoni
2003-06-17 19:47 ` Kris Warkentin
2003-06-17 20:01 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-06-17 20:15 ` Kris Warkentin
2003-06-17 20:24 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-06-18 0:14 ` Michael Snyder
2003-06-18 1:43 ` Kris Warkentin
2003-06-18 5:33 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-06-18 12:11 ` Kris Warkentin
2003-06-18 15:07 ` Kris Warkentin
2003-06-18 18:52 ` Michael Snyder
2003-06-18 19:09 ` Kris Warkentin
2003-06-18 19:20 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-06-18 20:10 ` Michael Snyder
2003-06-18 20:17 ` Kris Warkentin
2003-06-18 19:14 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-06-18 18:45 ` Michael Snyder
2003-06-18 18:41 ` Michael Snyder
2003-06-18 19:16 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-06-18 20:11 ` Michael Snyder
2003-06-18 20:19 ` Kris Warkentin
2003-06-18 20:27 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-06-18 20:51 ` Michael Snyder
2003-06-19 12:24 ` Kris Warkentin [this message]
2003-06-19 23:33 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-06-20 0:02 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-06-20 12:28 ` Kris Warkentin
2003-06-20 12:43 ` Kevin Buettner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='046901c3365d$c68e2a50$0202040a@catdog' \
--to=kewarken@qnx.com \
--cc=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=kevinb@redhat.com \
--cc=msnyder@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox