Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>,
	jorma.laaksonen@hut.fi, gdb-gnats@sources.redhat.com,
	gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: gdb/633: fully qualified pathnames in solib_map_sections() and remote debugging
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 08:07:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D57CF1A.4070405@ges.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020812143803.GA25086@nevyn.them.org>

> This leaves only the question of "how".  I don't want to change the
>> >behavior for a native debugger using the remote protocol; just for
>> >non-native debuggers.  How should I check for this?  Using configury to
>> >do it seems contrary to the direction gdbarch is going (i.e. a both
>> >native and cross debugger in one binary).
> 
>> 
>> This is a target environment thing?  So why not ask the target:
>> 
>> target_getenv()
>> 	-> qGetenv:<STRING>
>> 	<- value
> 
> 
> No (although I will get back to qGetenv later... :).  We're discussing
> the behavior of the function solib.c:solib_open.  It should vary
> depending on whether the current target is native or not, and I don't
> know how to figure that out correctly.

There are two approaches:  have solib_open() test for a local/remote 
target; or, add methods to the target vector that allow solib_open() to 
be written independant of the target.

Adding a local/remote test is going to be easier.  Having the code 
written local/remote independant might be better long term (but runs the 
risk of making things unnecessarily complex).

enjoy,
Andrew



  reply	other threads:[~2002-08-12 15:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20020806100634.11483.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
2002-08-06  6:20 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-09 16:12   ` Kevin Buettner
2002-08-11 20:25     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-12  4:18       ` Jorma Laaksonen
2002-08-12  7:28       ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-12  7:37         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-12  8:07           ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2002-08-12  8:48             ` Kevin Buettner
2002-08-12  8:55               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-12  9:20                 ` Kevin Buettner
2002-08-12  9:29                   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-12  9:20               ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-12  9:31                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-12  9:40                 ` Kevin Buettner
2002-08-12  9:53                   ` GDB functionalities for debugging Elf core dump Lucy Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3D57CF1A.4070405@ges.redhat.com \
    --to=ac131313@ges.redhat.com \
    --cc=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=gdb-gnats@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=jorma.laaksonen@hut.fi \
    --cc=kevinb@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox