From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>,
jorma.laaksonen@hut.fi, gdb-gnats@sources.redhat.com,
gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: gdb/633: fully qualified pathnames in solib_map_sections() and remote debugging
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 08:07:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D57CF1A.4070405@ges.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020812143803.GA25086@nevyn.them.org>
> This leaves only the question of "how". I don't want to change the
>> >behavior for a native debugger using the remote protocol; just for
>> >non-native debuggers. How should I check for this? Using configury to
>> >do it seems contrary to the direction gdbarch is going (i.e. a both
>> >native and cross debugger in one binary).
>
>>
>> This is a target environment thing? So why not ask the target:
>>
>> target_getenv()
>> -> qGetenv:<STRING>
>> <- value
>
>
> No (although I will get back to qGetenv later... :). We're discussing
> the behavior of the function solib.c:solib_open. It should vary
> depending on whether the current target is native or not, and I don't
> know how to figure that out correctly.
There are two approaches: have solib_open() test for a local/remote
target; or, add methods to the target vector that allow solib_open() to
be written independant of the target.
Adding a local/remote test is going to be easier. Having the code
written local/remote independant might be better long term (but runs the
risk of making things unnecessarily complex).
enjoy,
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-12 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20020806100634.11483.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
2002-08-06 6:20 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-09 16:12 ` Kevin Buettner
2002-08-11 20:25 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-12 4:18 ` Jorma Laaksonen
2002-08-12 7:28 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-12 7:37 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-12 8:07 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2002-08-12 8:48 ` Kevin Buettner
2002-08-12 8:55 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-12 9:20 ` Kevin Buettner
2002-08-12 9:29 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-12 9:20 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-12 9:31 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-12 9:40 ` Kevin Buettner
2002-08-12 9:53 ` GDB functionalities for debugging Elf core dump Lucy Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D57CF1A.4070405@ges.redhat.com \
--to=ac131313@ges.redhat.com \
--cc=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gdb-gnats@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=jorma.laaksonen@hut.fi \
--cc=kevinb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox