Re: gdb/633: fully qualified pathnames in solib_map_sections() and remote debugging

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>]

On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 12:19:52PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
> >At the moment, I like the first approach better because it's simpler.
> >I'd prefer that we wait on the more complicated approach until a need
> >is demonstrated for the additional complexity.
> >
> >
> >>Adding a local/remote test is going to be easier.
> >
> >
> >Do we already have such a test?
> 
> Well, looking at some finally dead hacks, ....
> 
> int
> remote_Z_write_wp_packet_supported_p (void)
> {
>   struct remote_state *rs = get_remote_state ();
>   /* Don't even think about it if the remote target isn't selected.  */
>   /* FIXME: cagney/2002-05-19: This shouldn't be necessary - the
>      WATCHPOINT methods should be in the target vector.  Ulgh!  */
>   if (target_shortname == NULL
>       || strcmp (target_shortname, "remote") != 0)
>     return 0;
> 
> notice that the problem it was trying to avoid was with ``target sim''. 
>  So in the above the question is no longer local/remote but local VS 
> remote VS sim VS ....

Note that the above hack doesn't even work.  We're going to default to
extended-remote for gdbserver eventually.  Could do it with strstr, I
suppose...

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer