From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1017 invoked by alias); 12 Aug 2002 15:07:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 994 invoked from network); 12 Aug 2002 15:07:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 12 Aug 2002 15:07:08 -0000 Received: from ges.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A7B53CFC; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 11:07:06 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3D57CF1A.4070405@ges.redhat.com> Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 08:07:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020810 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Kevin Buettner , jorma.laaksonen@hut.fi, gdb-gnats@sources.redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: gdb/633: fully qualified pathnames in solib_map_sections() and remote debugging References: <20020806100634.11483.qmail@sources.redhat.com> <20020806132047.GA16450@nevyn.them.org> <1020809231206.ZM11775@localhost.localdomain> <20020812032527.GA3838@nevyn.them.org> <3D57C611.4010403@ges.redhat.com> <20020812143803.GA25086@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00095.txt.bz2 > This leaves only the question of "how". I don't want to change the >> >behavior for a native debugger using the remote protocol; just for >> >non-native debuggers. How should I check for this? Using configury to >> >do it seems contrary to the direction gdbarch is going (i.e. a both >> >native and cross debugger in one binary). > >> >> This is a target environment thing? So why not ask the target: >> >> target_getenv() >> -> qGetenv: >> <- value > > > No (although I will get back to qGetenv later... :). We're discussing > the behavior of the function solib.c:solib_open. It should vary > depending on whether the current target is native or not, and I don't > know how to figure that out correctly. There are two approaches: have solib_open() test for a local/remote target; or, add methods to the target vector that allow solib_open() to be written independant of the target. Adding a local/remote test is going to be easier. Having the code written local/remote independant might be better long term (but runs the risk of making things unnecessarily complex). enjoy, Andrew