* remote.c: remote_insert_watchpoint et al
@ 2002-06-26 17:14 Johan Rydberg
2002-06-27 7:41 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Johan Rydberg @ 2002-06-26 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb
Hi,
Are there any (near) plans to make watchpoint functions
part of the (remote) target vector?
regards
johan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: remote.c: remote_insert_watchpoint et al
2002-06-26 17:14 remote.c: remote_insert_watchpoint et al Johan Rydberg
@ 2002-06-27 7:41 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-06-27 9:37 ` Johan Rydberg
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-06-27 7:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Johan Rydberg; +Cc: gdb
> Hi,
>
> Are there any (near) plans to make watchpoint functions
> part of the (remote) target vector?
Please do! Not having them in the target vector is considered a bug.
http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gdb&pr=161
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: remote.c: remote_insert_watchpoint et al
2002-06-27 7:41 ` Andrew Cagney
@ 2002-06-27 9:37 ` Johan Rydberg
2002-06-27 13:02 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Johan Rydberg @ 2002-06-27 9:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: gdb
On 2002.06.27 16:41 Andrew Cagney wrote:
: > Hi,
: >
: > Are there any (near) plans to make watchpoint functions
: > part of the (remote) target vector?
:
: Please do! Not having them in the target vector is considered a bug.
: http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gdb&pr=161
The only problem I see is that I have no copyright assignment
for gdb, just for binutils. But the changes needed might be
so small so that theres no reason for an assignment.
regards
johan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: remote.c: remote_insert_watchpoint et al
2002-06-27 9:37 ` Johan Rydberg
@ 2002-06-27 13:02 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-06-27 13:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Johan Rydberg; +Cc: gdb
> On 2002.06.27 16:41 Andrew Cagney wrote:
> : > Hi,
> : >
> : > Are there any (near) plans to make watchpoint functions
> : > part of the (remote) target vector?
> :
> : Please do! Not having them in the target vector is considered a bug.
> : http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gdb&pr=161
>
> The only problem I see is that I have no copyright assignment
> for gdb, just for binutils. But the changes needed might be
> so small so that theres no reason for an assignment.
I don't know what the changes will involve as I've never done this (in
fact I think everyone has been avoiding this one :-( ).
Can you at find out what the changes look like - how many files need to
be touched e.t.c.? If the operation is relatively small/mechanical then
it should be possible for someone with an assignment to reproduce it.
Getting the watchpoint stuff into the target vector is long overdue.
When it comes to (C) I tend to be very conservative :-/
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-06-27 20:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-06-26 17:14 remote.c: remote_insert_watchpoint et al Johan Rydberg
2002-06-27 7:41 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-06-27 9:37 ` Johan Rydberg
2002-06-27 13:02 ` Andrew Cagney
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox