* remote.c: remote_insert_watchpoint et al @ 2002-06-26 17:14 Johan Rydberg 2002-06-27 7:41 ` Andrew Cagney 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Johan Rydberg @ 2002-06-26 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gdb Hi, Are there any (near) plans to make watchpoint functions part of the (remote) target vector? regards johan ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: remote.c: remote_insert_watchpoint et al 2002-06-26 17:14 remote.c: remote_insert_watchpoint et al Johan Rydberg @ 2002-06-27 7:41 ` Andrew Cagney 2002-06-27 9:37 ` Johan Rydberg 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-06-27 7:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Johan Rydberg; +Cc: gdb > Hi, > > Are there any (near) plans to make watchpoint functions > part of the (remote) target vector? Please do! Not having them in the target vector is considered a bug. http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gdb&pr=161 Andrew ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: remote.c: remote_insert_watchpoint et al 2002-06-27 7:41 ` Andrew Cagney @ 2002-06-27 9:37 ` Johan Rydberg 2002-06-27 13:02 ` Andrew Cagney 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Johan Rydberg @ 2002-06-27 9:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: gdb On 2002.06.27 16:41 Andrew Cagney wrote: : > Hi, : > : > Are there any (near) plans to make watchpoint functions : > part of the (remote) target vector? : : Please do! Not having them in the target vector is considered a bug. : http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gdb&pr=161 The only problem I see is that I have no copyright assignment for gdb, just for binutils. But the changes needed might be so small so that theres no reason for an assignment. regards johan ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: remote.c: remote_insert_watchpoint et al 2002-06-27 9:37 ` Johan Rydberg @ 2002-06-27 13:02 ` Andrew Cagney 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-06-27 13:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Johan Rydberg; +Cc: gdb > On 2002.06.27 16:41 Andrew Cagney wrote: > : > Hi, > : > > : > Are there any (near) plans to make watchpoint functions > : > part of the (remote) target vector? > : > : Please do! Not having them in the target vector is considered a bug. > : http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gdb&pr=161 > > The only problem I see is that I have no copyright assignment > for gdb, just for binutils. But the changes needed might be > so small so that theres no reason for an assignment. I don't know what the changes will involve as I've never done this (in fact I think everyone has been avoiding this one :-( ). Can you at find out what the changes look like - how many files need to be touched e.t.c.? If the operation is relatively small/mechanical then it should be possible for someone with an assignment to reproduce it. Getting the watchpoint stuff into the target vector is long overdue. When it comes to (C) I tend to be very conservative :-/ Andrew ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-06-27 20:02 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2002-06-26 17:14 remote.c: remote_insert_watchpoint et al Johan Rydberg 2002-06-27 7:41 ` Andrew Cagney 2002-06-27 9:37 ` Johan Rydberg 2002-06-27 13:02 ` Andrew Cagney
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox