* High priority PRs
@ 2002-03-15 15:23 Andrew Cagney
2002-03-16 7:42 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-03-15 15:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb
I'm currently going through the PR database identifying a few PRs,
making them High, the rest being put back to medium.
This idea is stolen straight from GCC. A High Priority PR identifies
something that is (hopefully) going to be fixed in the next release
The ones I'm identifying (HP/UX, AIX, True64) are config/build problems
where a patch has been submitted. (Hi Alex :-)
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: High priority PRs
2002-03-15 15:23 High priority PRs Andrew Cagney
@ 2002-03-16 7:42 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-03-16 9:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-03-16 7:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: gdb
> I'm currently going through the PR database identifying a few PRs, making them High, the rest being put back to medium.
>
> This idea is stolen straight from GCC. A High Priority PR identifies something that is (hopefully) going to be fixed in the next release
>
> The ones I'm identifying (HP/UX, AIX, True64) are config/build problems where a patch has been submitted. (Hi Alex :-)
Done. See attached. They'll either get fixed or listed as PROBLEMS.
Anyone want to attack the debug info regressions?
Andrew
http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=submit%20query&database=gdb&category=gdb&severity=all&priority=high&responsible=all&submitter_id=net&state=all&ignoreclosed=Ignore%20Closed&class=all&synopsis=&multitext=&columns=category&columns=state&columns=priority&columns=responsible&columns=synopsis&displaydate=Display%20Current%20Date&sortby=Responsible&queryname=High%20%28for%20releases%29
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: High priority PRs
2002-03-16 7:42 ` Andrew Cagney
@ 2002-03-16 9:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2002-03-16 9:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: gdb
On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 10:42:43AM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >I'm currently going through the PR database identifying a few PRs, making
> >them High, the rest being put back to medium.
> >
> >This idea is stolen straight from GCC. A High Priority PR identifies
> >something that is (hopefully) going to be fixed in the next release
> >
> >The ones I'm identifying (HP/UX, AIX, True64) are config/build problems
> >where a patch has been submitted. (Hi Alex :-)
>
>
> Done. See attached. They'll either get fixed or listed as PROBLEMS.
> Anyone want to attack the debug info regressions?
Yup, I'm looking at them.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-03-16 17:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-03-15 15:23 High priority PRs Andrew Cagney
2002-03-16 7:42 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-03-16 9:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox