From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32593 invoked by alias); 16 Mar 2002 17:32:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 32435 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2002 17:32:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (128.2.145.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Mar 2002 17:32:56 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 16mI3K-0006ym-00; Sat, 16 Mar 2002 12:33:10 -0500 Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 09:32:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: High priority PRs Message-ID: <20020316123310.A26767@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <3C92825D.7020904@cygnus.com> <3C9367F3.3060708@cygnus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3C9367F3.3060708@cygnus.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00151.txt.bz2 On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 10:42:43AM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >I'm currently going through the PR database identifying a few PRs, making > >them High, the rest being put back to medium. > > > >This idea is stolen straight from GCC. A High Priority PR identifies > >something that is (hopefully) going to be fixed in the next release > > > >The ones I'm identifying (HP/UX, AIX, True64) are config/build problems > >where a patch has been submitted. (Hi Alex :-) > > > Done. See attached. They'll either get fixed or listed as PROBLEMS. > Anyone want to attack the debug info regressions? Yup, I'm looking at them. -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer