* Moving to GDB_MULTI_ARCH_PARTIAL
@ 2002-02-06 9:21 Richard Earnshaw
2002-02-07 19:45 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Richard Earnshaw @ 2002-02-06 9:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb; +Cc: Richard.Earnshaw
I'm trying to get the ARM target building now at multi-arch partial. It
seems that the auto-generated definitions at this level are to an extent
inconsistent.
For example, gdbarch_validate() requires that PUSH_ARGUMENTS is fully
implemented as a multi-arch call, but the code in gdbarch.h does not fault
a partial definition of this.
That is, in gdbarch.h we have
#if (GDB_MULTI_ARCH > GDB_MULTI_ARCH_PARTIAL) && defined (PUSH_ARGUMENTS)
#error "Non multi-arch definition of PUSH_ARGUMENTS"
#endif
#if GDB_MULTI_ARCH
#if (GDB_MULTI_ARCH > GDB_MULTI_ARCH_PARTIAL) || !defined (PUSH_ARGUMENTS)
#define PUSH_ARGUMENTS(nargs, args, sp, struct_return, struct_addr)
(gdbarch_pus
h_arguments (current_gdbarch, nargs, args, sp, struct_return, struct_addr))
#endif
#endif
but then in gdbarch_validate,
if ((GDB_MULTI_ARCH >= 1)
&& (gdbarch->push_arguments == 0))
fprintf_unfiltered (log, "\n\tpush_arguments");
Surely these two should be brought into line (one tests with ">" and the
other with ">=").
R.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Moving to GDB_MULTI_ARCH_PARTIAL
2002-02-06 9:21 Moving to GDB_MULTI_ARCH_PARTIAL Richard Earnshaw
@ 2002-02-07 19:45 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-02-07 23:08 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-02-07 19:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard.Earnshaw; +Cc: gdb
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1236 bytes --]
> I'm trying to get the ARM target building now at multi-arch partial. It
> seems that the auto-generated definitions at this level are to an extent
> inconsistent.
>
> For example, gdbarch_validate() requires that PUSH_ARGUMENTS is fully
> implemented as a multi-arch call, but the code in gdbarch.h does not fault
> a partial definition of this.
>
> That is, in gdbarch.h we have
>
> #if (GDB_MULTI_ARCH > GDB_MULTI_ARCH_PARTIAL) && defined (PUSH_ARGUMENTS)
> #error "Non multi-arch definition of PUSH_ARGUMENTS"
> #endif
> #if GDB_MULTI_ARCH
> #if (GDB_MULTI_ARCH > GDB_MULTI_ARCH_PARTIAL) || !defined (PUSH_ARGUMENTS)
> #define PUSH_ARGUMENTS(nargs, args, sp, struct_return, struct_addr)
> (gdbarch_pus
> h_arguments (current_gdbarch, nargs, args, sp, struct_return, struct_addr))
> #endif
> #endif
>
> but then in gdbarch_validate,
>
> if ((GDB_MULTI_ARCH >= 1)
> && (gdbarch->push_arguments == 0))
> fprintf_unfiltered (log, "\n\tpush_arguments");
>
>
> Surely these two should be brought into line (one tests with ">" and the
> other with ">=").
Er, yes. Good point. Try the attached. If it works, I'll try to
simplify the .c file as well
In the mean time I'll re-build everything :-/
Andrew
[-- Attachment #2: diffs --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4024 bytes --]
2002-02-07 Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
* gdbarch.sh: For for level one methods, disallow a definition
when partially multi-arched. Check for bad field.
* gdbarch.h: Re-generate.
Index: gdbarch.sh
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/gdbarch.sh,v
retrieving revision 1.108
diff -u -r1.108 gdbarch.sh
--- gdbarch.sh 2002/02/06 13:00:45 1.108
+++ gdbarch.sh 2002/02/08 03:42:28
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
if test ! -r ${file}
then
echo "${file} missing? cp new-${file} ${file}" 1>&2
- elif diff -c ${file} new-${file}
+ elif diff ${file} new-${file}
then
echo "${file} unchanged" 1>&2
else
@@ -76,6 +76,13 @@
fi
done
+ case "${level}" in
+ 1 ) gt_level=">= GDB_MULTI_ARCH_PARTIAL" ;;
+ 2 ) gt_level="> GDB_MULTI_ARCH_PARTIAL" ;;
+ "" ) ;;
+ * ) error "Error: bad level for ${function}" 1>&2 ; kill $$ ; exit 1 ;;
+ esac
+
case "${class}" in
m ) staticdefault="${predefault}" ;;
M ) staticdefault="0" ;;
@@ -354,7 +361,9 @@
# Currently unused.
- *) exit 1;;
+ *)
+ echo "Bad field ${field}"
+ exit 1;;
esac
done
@@ -736,11 +745,11 @@
printf "\n"
printf "extern ${returntype} gdbarch_${function} (struct gdbarch *gdbarch);\n"
printf "/* set_gdbarch_${function}() - not applicable - pre-initialized. */\n"
- printf "#if (GDB_MULTI_ARCH > GDB_MULTI_ARCH_PARTIAL) && defined (${macro})\n"
+ printf "#if (GDB_MULTI_ARCH ${gt_level}) && defined (${macro})\n"
printf "#error \"Non multi-arch definition of ${macro}\"\n"
printf "#endif\n"
printf "#if GDB_MULTI_ARCH\n"
- printf "#if (GDB_MULTI_ARCH > GDB_MULTI_ARCH_PARTIAL) || !defined (${macro})\n"
+ printf "#if (GDB_MULTI_ARCH ${gt_level}) || !defined (${macro})\n"
printf "#define ${macro} (gdbarch_${function} (current_gdbarch))\n"
printf "#endif\n"
printf "#endif\n"
@@ -785,10 +794,10 @@
printf "#endif\n"
printf "\n"
printf "extern int gdbarch_${function}_p (struct gdbarch *gdbarch);\n"
- printf "#if (GDB_MULTI_ARCH > GDB_MULTI_ARCH_PARTIAL) && defined (${macro}_P)\n"
+ printf "#if (GDB_MULTI_ARCH ${gt_level}) && defined (${macro}_P)\n"
printf "#error \"Non multi-arch definition of ${macro}\"\n"
printf "#endif\n"
- printf "#if (GDB_MULTI_ARCH > GDB_MULTI_ARCH_PARTIAL) || !defined (${macro}_P)\n"
+ printf "#if (GDB_MULTI_ARCH ${gt_level}) || !defined (${macro}_P)\n"
printf "#define ${macro}_P() (gdbarch_${function}_p (current_gdbarch))\n"
printf "#endif\n"
fi
@@ -807,11 +816,11 @@
printf "\n"
printf "extern ${returntype} gdbarch_${function} (struct gdbarch *gdbarch);\n"
printf "extern void set_gdbarch_${function} (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, ${returntype} ${function});\n"
- printf "#if (GDB_MULTI_ARCH > GDB_MULTI_ARCH_PARTIAL) && defined (${macro})\n"
+ printf "#if (GDB_MULTI_ARCH ${gt_level}) && defined (${macro})\n"
printf "#error \"Non multi-arch definition of ${macro}\"\n"
printf "#endif\n"
printf "#if GDB_MULTI_ARCH\n"
- printf "#if (GDB_MULTI_ARCH > GDB_MULTI_ARCH_PARTIAL) || !defined (${macro})\n"
+ printf "#if (GDB_MULTI_ARCH ${gt_level}) || !defined (${macro})\n"
printf "#define ${macro} (gdbarch_${function} (current_gdbarch))\n"
printf "#endif\n"
printf "#endif\n"
@@ -853,11 +862,11 @@
printf "extern void set_gdbarch_${function} (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, gdbarch_${function}_ftype *${function});\n"
if class_is_multiarch_p ; then :
else
- printf "#if (GDB_MULTI_ARCH > GDB_MULTI_ARCH_PARTIAL) && defined (${macro})\n"
+ printf "#if (GDB_MULTI_ARCH ${gt_level}) && defined (${macro})\n"
printf "#error \"Non multi-arch definition of ${macro}\"\n"
printf "#endif\n"
printf "#if GDB_MULTI_ARCH\n"
- printf "#if (GDB_MULTI_ARCH > GDB_MULTI_ARCH_PARTIAL) || !defined (${macro})\n"
+ printf "#if (GDB_MULTI_ARCH ${gt_level}) || !defined (${macro})\n"
if [ "x${actual}" = "x" ]
then
printf "#define ${macro}() (gdbarch_${function} (current_gdbarch))\n"
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Moving to GDB_MULTI_ARCH_PARTIAL
2002-02-07 19:45 ` Andrew Cagney
@ 2002-02-07 23:08 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-02-08 1:38 ` Richard Earnshaw
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-02-07 23:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard.Earnshaw; +Cc: gdb
> In the mean time I'll re-build everything :-/
i386-aout:
gdbarch.h:1147: #error "Non multi-arch definition of REGISTER_CONVERTIBLE"
gdbarch.h:1151: warning: `REGISTER_CONVERTIBLE' redefined
tm.h:215: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
gdbarch.h:1375: #error "Non multi-arch definition of PUSH_ARGUMENTS"
gdbarch.h:1379: warning: `PUSH_ARGUMENTS' redefined
tm.h:242: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
looking around:
tm-i386.h:#define REGISTER_CONVERTIBLE(regnum) i386_register_convertible (regnum)
tm-ptx.h:#undef REGISTER_CONVERTIBLE
tm-ptx.h:#define REGISTER_CONVERTIBLE(N) \
tm-symmetry.h:#undef REGISTER_CONVERTIBLE
tm-symmetry.h:#define REGISTER_CONVERTIBLE(N) \
this suggests REGISTER_CONVERTIBLE doesn't need to be immediatly converted.
However, it also explains why, at level one, it isn't strict about
overriding macros. Given a case like the i386, the base cpu may be
multi-arched but the variants (tm-ptx.h and tm-symmetry.h) may not.
This again lets them continue to build and work.
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Moving to GDB_MULTI_ARCH_PARTIAL
2002-02-07 23:08 ` Andrew Cagney
@ 2002-02-08 1:38 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-02-08 7:19 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Richard Earnshaw @ 2002-02-08 1:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: Richard.Earnshaw, gdb
ac131313@cygnus.com said:
> this suggests REGISTER_CONVERTIBLE doesn't need to be immediatly
> converted.
> However, it also explains why, at level one, it isn't strict about
> overriding macros. Given a case like the i386, the base cpu may be
> multi-arched but the variants (tm-ptx.h and tm-symmetry.h) may not.
> This again lets them continue to build and work.
So if they can continue to work with the existing definitions, why aren't
REGISTER_CONVERTIBLE and PUSH_ARGUMENTS level 2?
R.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Moving to GDB_MULTI_ARCH_PARTIAL
2002-02-08 1:38 ` Richard Earnshaw
@ 2002-02-08 7:19 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-02-08 7:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard.Earnshaw; +Cc: gdb
> this suggests REGISTER_CONVERTIBLE doesn't need to be immediatly
>> converted.
>
>
>> However, it also explains why, at level one, it isn't strict about
>> overriding macros. Given a case like the i386, the base cpu may be
>> multi-arched but the variants (tm-ptx.h and tm-symmetry.h) may not.
>> This again lets them continue to build and work.
>
>
>
> So if they can continue to work with the existing definitions, why aren't
> REGISTER_CONVERTIBLE and PUSH_ARGUMENTS level 2?
(I'm currently going through and reviewing these - I've found two other
candidates: PUSH_RETURN_ADDRESS (bug) and CALL_DUMMY_LOCATION (not a bug))
It is historic. The very original gdbarch.sh was an all or nothing
afair - the developer had to convert every single macro before they
could turn on multi-arch. Strangly (:-^) this got serious push back.
The process was changed to be tolerant to partially multi-arch targets.
A few artifacts from the old way still linger. When someone notices
they get tweeked.
thanks for the pointers,
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-02-08 15:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-02-06 9:21 Moving to GDB_MULTI_ARCH_PARTIAL Richard Earnshaw
2002-02-07 19:45 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-02-07 23:08 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-02-08 1:38 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-02-08 7:19 ` Andrew Cagney
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox