From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <dmj+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Cc: Fabrice Gautier <gautier@email.enst.fr>,
jtc@redback.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: gdbserver (was Re: parcelling up struct gdbarch)
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 11:10:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B547FA1.2010605@cygnus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010717101136.A16841@nevyn.them.org>
>
> How so? It seems to me to be a much simpler problem, instead. It
> means that gdbserver needes target_signal_to_host and friends, which is
> much easier. If, that is, we change documentation and gdbserver rather than
> remote.c.
If gdbserver is going to pass ptrace() (i.e. target dependant) register
bufers then should it also pass back target dependant signal numbers?
In fact, thinking about it, I know where my comment would have come from
- I would have looked at gdbserver and tried to document the current
behavour. Only later did I notice that the comment was wrong and
remote.c wasn't doing any conversion :-/
So, which is correct?
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-07-17 11:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-07-13 0:16 parcelling up struct gdbarch Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-07-13 12:35 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-07-13 14:53 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-07-14 8:33 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-07-16 11:25 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-07-16 11:27 ` H . J . Lu
2001-07-16 12:04 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-07-16 12:34 ` J.T. Conklin
2001-07-16 15:30 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-07-16 15:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-07-16 17:24 ` gdbserver (was Re: parcelling up struct gdbarch) Fabrice Gautier
2001-07-16 21:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-07-16 22:22 ` Fabrice Gautier
2001-07-16 22:28 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-07-17 10:00 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-07-17 10:11 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-07-17 11:10 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2001-07-17 11:21 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-07-17 11:46 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-07-17 10:36 ` Quality Quorum
2001-07-16 13:05 ` parcelling up struct gdbarch Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-07-16 15:15 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-07-16 15:49 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-07-17 10:46 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-07-17 11:03 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-07-17 11:37 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-07-18 13:21 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-07-18 22:53 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-07-18 23:22 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-07-19 0:23 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-07-19 7:51 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-07-19 7:44 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-07-18 8:09 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-07-16 23:37 gdbserver (was Re: parcelling up struct gdbarch) Korbel, Michal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3B547FA1.2010605@cygnus.com \
--to=ac131313@cygnus.com \
--cc=dmj+@andrew.cmu.edu \
--cc=gautier@email.enst.fr \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=jtc@redback.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox