From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dmj+@andrew.cmu.edu>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: parcelling up struct gdbarch
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 00:16:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010713001635.A19524@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
For the benefit of gdbserver, as discussed, I'd like to break the struct
into two pieces - call them, hypothetically, gdbarch and gdbarch_native.
Things which gdbserver should be able to share, like PC_REGNUM and other
things relating to register layout, or like CANNOT_FETCH_REGISTER, etc.,
would go in the smaller native struct. They could be fetched from a (split
off from the existing) target specific file, or temporarily added in the
appropriate low-<arch>.c.
Does this sound reasonable?
Also, as a first step I would like to break the data table out of gdbarch.sh
into a separate file. Is there any reason not to do this? Then, rather
than introducing another field, I can introduce a second data file for the
native elements.
Native is perhaps not the best name, as e.g. PC_REGNUM need to be known even
in non-native configurations, but calling it gdbarch_target seems wrong to
me. I'm open to better naming suggestions.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next reply other threads:[~2001-07-13 0:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-07-13 0:16 Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2001-07-13 12:35 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-07-13 14:53 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-07-14 8:33 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-07-16 11:25 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-07-16 11:27 ` H . J . Lu
2001-07-16 12:04 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-07-16 12:34 ` J.T. Conklin
2001-07-16 15:30 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-07-16 15:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-07-16 17:24 ` gdbserver (was Re: parcelling up struct gdbarch) Fabrice Gautier
2001-07-16 21:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-07-16 22:22 ` Fabrice Gautier
2001-07-16 22:28 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-07-17 10:00 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-07-17 10:11 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-07-17 11:10 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-07-17 11:21 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-07-17 11:46 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-07-17 10:36 ` Quality Quorum
2001-07-16 13:05 ` parcelling up struct gdbarch Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-07-16 15:15 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-07-16 15:49 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-07-17 10:46 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-07-17 11:03 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-07-17 11:37 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-07-18 13:21 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-07-18 22:53 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-07-18 23:22 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-07-19 0:23 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-07-19 7:51 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-07-19 7:44 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-07-18 8:09 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010713001635.A19524@nevyn.them.org \
--to=dmj+@andrew.cmu.edu \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox