* Post Hooks Broken!!! Fix Attached.
@ 2001-02-22 22:02 Steven Johnson
2001-02-23 5:45 ` Fernando Nasser
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Steven Johnson @ 2001-02-22 22:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb; +Cc: Fernando Nasser
Hi,
I Tried to use a late CVS snapshot of GDB/Insight and found my Post Hook
was broken.
It seems that it has been broken since the CLI sub-directory was
created, it was a simple problem and the patch to fix it is attached.
Defining a Post-Hook currently overwrites the standard pre command hook,
In the definition code, I had to fix the setting of the pointers to the
hook code which were erroneously setting the pre pointers instead of the
post pointers.
Steven.
Patch Follows:
diff -C2 -r -b ../gdb_cvs/src/gdb/cli/cli-script.c src/gdb/cli/cli-script.c
*** ../gdb_cvs/src/gdb/cli/cli-script.c Thu Feb 15 08:50:31 2001
--- src/gdb/cli/cli-script.c Fri Feb 23 14:55:49 2001
***************
*** 1166,1171 ****
break;
case CMD_POST_HOOK:
! hookc->hook_pre = newc; /* Target gets hooked. */
! newc->hookee_pre = hookc; /* We are marked as hooking target cmd. */
break;
default:
--- 1166,1171 ----
break;
case CMD_POST_HOOK:
! hookc->hook_post = newc; /* Target gets hooked. */
! newc->hookee_post = hookc; /* We are marked as hooking target cmd. */
break;
default:
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Post Hooks Broken!!! Fix Attached.
2001-02-22 22:02 Post Hooks Broken!!! Fix Attached Steven Johnson
@ 2001-02-23 5:45 ` Fernando Nasser
2001-02-25 21:11 ` Steven Johnson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Fernando Nasser @ 2001-02-23 5:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steven Johnson; +Cc: gdb
Steven Johnson wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I Tried to use a late CVS snapshot of GDB/Insight and found my Post Hook
> was broken.
>
> It seems that it has been broken since the CLI sub-directory was
> created,
Hi Steven,
It was before that. I went through the archives and it seems that it
was broken when the the 'if' statement that referred to PRE_HOOK was
changed to a 'switch' on "hook_type", with the CMD_{PRE,POST}_HOOK
enums.
I will check the patch in latter today, but this shows that we need a
test for this.
Can you send me a sequence of commands and expected responses that would
test if the post hook has been correctly installed and another one
showing that the pre hook has not been clobbered? I can use it to
create a dejagnu test for it.
Regards,
Fernando
it was a simple problem and the patch to fix it is attached.
> Defining a Post-Hook currently overwrites the standard pre command hook,
> In the definition code, I had to fix the setting of the pointers to the
> hook code which were erroneously setting the pre pointers instead of the
> post pointers.
>
> Steven.
>
> Patch Follows:
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> diff -C2 -r -b ../gdb_cvs/src/gdb/cli/cli-script.c src/gdb/cli/cli-script.c
> *** ../gdb_cvs/src/gdb/cli/cli-script.c Thu Feb 15 08:50:31 2001
> --- src/gdb/cli/cli-script.c Fri Feb 23 14:55:49 2001
> ***************
> *** 1166,1171 ****
> break;
> case CMD_POST_HOOK:
> ! hookc->hook_pre = newc; /* Target gets hooked. */
> ! newc->hookee_pre = hookc; /* We are marked as hooking target cmd. */
> break;
> default:
> --- 1166,1171 ----
> break;
> case CMD_POST_HOOK:
> ! hookc->hook_post = newc; /* Target gets hooked. */
> ! newc->hookee_post = hookc; /* We are marked as hooking target cmd. */
> break;
> default:
--
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat Canada Ltd. E-Mail: fnasser@redhat.com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Post Hooks Broken!!! Fix Attached.
2001-02-23 5:45 ` Fernando Nasser
@ 2001-02-25 21:11 ` Steven Johnson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Steven Johnson @ 2001-02-25 21:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fernando Nasser; +Cc: gdb
Hi Fernando,
Fernando Nasser wrote:
>
> Hi Steven,
>
> It was before that. I went through the archives and it seems that it
> was broken when the the 'if' statement that referred to PRE_HOOK was
> changed to a 'switch' on "hook_type", with the CMD_{PRE,POST}_HOOK
> enums.
>
> I will check the patch in latter today, but this shows that we need a
> test for this.
>
Doesn't surprise me, I hadn't done anything with GDB for a while.
> Can you send me a sequence of commands and expected responses that would
> test if the post hook has been correctly installed and another one
> showing that the pre hook has not been clobbered? I can use it to
> create a dejagnu test for it.
Here it is:
(gdb)echo hooked
hooked
(gdb)define hook-echo
>echo before
>end
(gdb)echo hooked
beforehooked
(gdb)define hookpost-echo
>echo after
>end
(gdb)echo hooked
beforehookedafter
(gdb)define hook-echo
>end
(gdb)echo hooked
hookedafter
(gdb)define hookpost-echo
>end
(gdb)echo hooked
hooked
(gdb)
I hope this is what you were looking for? I used echo, because I
thought it would be easy to test with it on every platform. Obviously
there are a few permutations of this but Im not sure they are worth
checking individually.
Regards,
Steven Johnson
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-02-25 21:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-02-22 22:02 Post Hooks Broken!!! Fix Attached Steven Johnson
2001-02-23 5:45 ` Fernando Nasser
2001-02-25 21:11 ` Steven Johnson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox