Re: Frame lost after 'leave' and before 'ret' instruction on i386?

[Aleksandar Ristovski <aristovski@qnx.com>]

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 10:51:12AM -0400, Aleksandar Ristovski wrote:
>> So from what I can see, they all rely on symbol info (find_pc_partial_function).
> 
> Generally, so that you don't go marching off into the code of another
> function.  If you only look at instructions forwards, and do not skip
> any branches, you can probably do without it.
> 

Am I again missing something big or is this really being called only from breakpoint.c?

I would imagine it should be called from other spots as well. I find handle_inferior_status quite complicated and do not fully understand it, but shouldn't it be called from there as well (when stepi-ing, we need to know if the frame can be created or not).