From: Aleksandar Ristovski <aristovski@qnx.com>
To: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Frame lost after 'leave' and before 'ret' instruction on i386?
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 17:28:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <482DC452.1020102@qnx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200805161723.m4GHNvWv024856@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
Mark Kettenis wrote:
> The compiler is supposed to give us unwind info for the function's
> epilogue, but unfortunately GCC doesn't. There's not much we can do
> about it in GDB. Fortunately it isnt an issue that users see a lot.
>
Out of curiosity: what is the problem with specifying epilogue? Am I wrong when I say that there can be only so many epilogue types (i.e. compiler will not generate infinite number of epilogues)? Therefore, only one index in a 'epilogue description table' would suffice...
(or am I over-simplifying?)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-16 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-16 15:32 Aleksandar Ristovski
2008-05-16 15:58 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-05-16 16:02 ` Aleksandar Ristovski
2008-05-16 16:09 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-05-22 14:29 ` Aleksandar Ristovski
2008-05-22 14:40 ` Aleksandar Ristovski
2008-05-22 14:50 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-05-22 15:05 ` Aleksandar Ristovski
2008-05-22 16:00 ` Aleksandar Ristovski
2008-05-22 16:02 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-05-23 15:19 ` Aleksandar Ristovski
2008-05-22 18:06 ` Aleksandar Ristovski
2008-05-23 17:11 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-05-23 17:23 ` Michael Snyder
2008-05-26 23:08 ` Aleksandar Ristovski
2008-05-27 21:33 ` Aleksandar Ristovski
2008-05-29 6:21 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2008-05-29 6:22 ` Aleksandar Ristovski
2008-06-04 13:12 ` Aleksandar Ristovski
2008-06-05 20:12 ` Mark Kettenis
2008-05-16 17:24 ` Mark Kettenis
2008-05-16 17:28 ` Aleksandar Ristovski [this message]
2008-05-16 17:47 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-05-16 17:48 ` Mark Kettenis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=482DC452.1020102@qnx.com \
--to=aristovski@qnx.com \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox