Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* gdb 6.6 build fails on Solaris 9
@ 2007-06-22 17:04 Jonah Simandjuntak
  2007-06-22 17:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jonah Simandjuntak @ 2007-06-22 17:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1281 bytes --]

Hello,

I've been searching the archive, but couldn't find a solution to the problem below. I am compiling this on a SPARC Solaris 9.

Here is the output:
...
/bin/sh ./libtool --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H  -I. -I.././bfd -I. -I. -I.././bfd -I.././bfd/../include  -I./../intl    -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Werror -g -O2 -c -o bfd.lo bfd.c
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.././bfd -I. -I. -I.././bfd -I.././bfd/../include -I./../intl -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Werror -g -O2 -c bfd.c -o bfd.o
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
bfd.c: In function `_bfd_abort':
bfd.c:848: warning: `noreturn' function does return
*** Error code 1
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `bfd.lo'
Current working directory /export/home/simandj/gdb-6.6/bfd
*** Error code 1
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `all-recursive'
Current working directory /export/home/simandj/gdb-6.6/bfd
*** Error code 1
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `all'
Current working directory /export/home/simandj/gdb-6.6/bfd
*** Error code 1
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `all-bfd'
Current working directory /export/home/simandj/gdb-6.6
*** Error code 1
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `all'

Any idea?

Thanks.

--Jonah

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: gdb 6.6 build fails on Solaris 9
  2007-06-22 17:04 gdb 6.6 build fails on Solaris 9 Jonah Simandjuntak
@ 2007-06-22 17:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
  2007-06-22 17:46   ` Jonah Simandjuntak
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2007-06-22 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jonah Simandjuntak, binutils; +Cc: gdb

Copying the binutils list, as that's where BFD is maintained.

On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 01:04:20PM -0400, Jonah Simandjuntak wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I've been searching the archive, but couldn't find a solution to the problem below. I am compiling this on a SPARC Solaris 9.
> 
> Here is the output:
> ...
> /bin/sh ./libtool --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H  -I. -I.././bfd -I. -I. -I.././bfd -I.././bfd/../include  -I./../intl    -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Werror -g -O2 -c -o bfd.lo bfd.c
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.././bfd -I. -I. -I.././bfd -I.././bfd/../include -I./../intl -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Werror -g -O2 -c bfd.c -o bfd.o
> cc1: warnings being treated as errors
> bfd.c: In function `_bfd_abort':
> bfd.c:848: warning: `noreturn' function does return
> *** Error code 1

Sounds to me like your headers do not mark _exit as noreturn, and GCC
is not doing so automatically.  I don't remember how this is supposed
to work, but I thought GCC would automatically add the attribute.
What version of gcc is this?

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: gdb 6.6 build fails on Solaris 9
  2007-06-22 17:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
@ 2007-06-22 17:46   ` Jonah Simandjuntak
  2007-06-22 17:53     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jonah Simandjuntak @ 2007-06-22 17:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: binutils, gdb

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 272 bytes --]

On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 01:17:39PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> What version of gcc is this?
> 
> -- 
> Daniel Jacobowitz
> CodeSourcery

This is the output of gcc:
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.0

Should I use the latest gcc then?

TIA.

--Jonah

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: gdb 6.6 build fails on Solaris 9
  2007-06-22 17:46   ` Jonah Simandjuntak
@ 2007-06-22 17:53     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2007-06-22 17:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jonah Simandjuntak; +Cc: binutils, gdb

On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 01:46:32PM -0400, Jonah Simandjuntak wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 01:17:39PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > What version of gcc is this?
> > 
> > -- 
> > Daniel Jacobowitz
> > CodeSourcery
> 
> This is the output of gcc:
> Thread model: posix
> gcc version 3.0
> 
> Should I use the latest gcc then?

That's a very old version - I believe it's from 2000.  I would
recommend you get a newer compiler.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-06-22 17:53 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-06-22 17:04 gdb 6.6 build fails on Solaris 9 Jonah Simandjuntak
2007-06-22 17:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-06-22 17:46   ` Jonah Simandjuntak
2007-06-22 17:53     ` Daniel Jacobowitz

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox