From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19330 invoked by alias); 22 Jun 2007 17:53:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 19312 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Jun 2007 17:53:47 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 17:53:43 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B26A59817C; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 17:53:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97BEF9817A; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 17:53:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1I1nKX-0008Ix-Bj; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 13:53:57 -0400 Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 17:53:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Jonah Simandjuntak Cc: binutils@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: gdb 6.6 build fails on Solaris 9 Message-ID: <20070622175357.GA31817@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Jonah Simandjuntak , binutils@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org References: <20070622170420.GA15606@ip-68-178-164-59.ip.secureserver.net> <20070622171739.GA29846@caradoc.them.org> <20070622174632.GA9868@ip-68-178-164-59.ip.secureserver.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070622174632.GA9868@ip-68-178-164-59.ip.secureserver.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg00199.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 01:46:32PM -0400, Jonah Simandjuntak wrote: > On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 01:17:39PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > What version of gcc is this? > > > > -- > > Daniel Jacobowitz > > CodeSourcery > > This is the output of gcc: > Thread model: posix > gcc version 3.0 > > Should I use the latest gcc then? That's a very old version - I believe it's from 2000. I would recommend you get a newer compiler. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery