Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* follow-fork and detach-on-fork should have one command
@ 2006-04-10 18:15 PAUL GILLIAM
  2006-04-10 21:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: PAUL GILLIAM @ 2006-04-10 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb

Currently follow-fork is yes or no and detach-on-fork is yes or no.

It seems to me that it would be clearer if there was only one, with
three states "parent", "child", "both".

Feel free to flame me if this has already been talked to death.

-=# Paul #=-


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2006-04-10 18:10 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-04-10 18:15 follow-fork and detach-on-fork should have one command PAUL GILLIAM
2006-04-10 21:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox