From: PAUL GILLIAM <pgilliam@us.ibm.com>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: follow-fork and detach-on-fork should have one command
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 18:15:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1144688788.10503.8.camel@dufur.beaverton.ibm.com> (raw)
Currently follow-fork is yes or no and detach-on-fork is yes or no.
It seems to me that it would be clearer if there was only one, with
three states "parent", "child", "both".
Feel free to flame me if this has already been talked to death.
-=# Paul #=-
next reply other threads:[~2006-04-10 18:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-10 18:15 PAUL GILLIAM [this message]
2006-04-10 21:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1144688788.10503.8.camel@dufur.beaverton.ibm.com \
--to=pgilliam@us.ibm.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox