From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
Cc: Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org>,
gcc@gcc.gnu.org, GDB <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: gcc 4.0 generates location list without DW_AT_frame_base
Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2005 20:09:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050101200945.GA30989@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050101191459.GA23014@lucon.org>
On Sat, Jan 01, 2005 at 11:15:00AM -0800, H. J. Lu wrote:
> The modified patch works with tls_symbolic_operand in i386. However,
> I do see
>
> <2><427491>: Abbrev Number: 39 (DW_TAG_inlined_subroutine)
> DW_AT_sibling : <427510>
> DW_AT_abstract_origin: <427159>
> DW_AT_low_pc : 0x8399aea
> DW_AT_high_pc : 0x8399b3c
> <3><4274a2>: Abbrev Number: 37 (DW_TAG_formal_parameter)
> DW_AT_abstract_origin: <42716b>
> <3><4274a7>: Abbrev Number: 37 (DW_TAG_formal_parameter)
> DW_AT_abstract_origin: <427177>
Do the abstract origins have locations? Otherwise, that's a problem...
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-01 20:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-22 1:16 Is this a gcc, gdb or readelf bug? H. J. Lu
2004-12-22 11:09 ` Nick Clifton
2004-12-22 18:25 ` H. J. Lu
2004-12-23 3:43 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-30 19:24 ` GDB 6.3 assumes that DW_AT_frame_base exists H. J. Lu
2004-12-30 19:36 ` H. J. Lu
2004-12-30 19:56 ` H. J. Lu
2004-12-30 20:07 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-30 20:23 ` Gdb generates location list without DW_AT_frame_base H. J. Lu
2004-12-30 20:28 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-30 20:52 ` Gdb generates DW_OP_fbreg in " H. J. Lu
2004-12-30 20:56 ` Gdb generates " Daniel Berlin
2004-12-30 21:05 ` H. J. Lu
2004-12-31 0:35 ` Daniel Berlin
2004-12-31 19:57 ` H. J. Lu
2004-12-31 20:09 ` Daniel Berlin
2004-12-31 20:11 ` H. J. Lu
2004-12-31 20:16 ` Daniel Berlin
[not found] ` <20041231163806.GA1335@lucon.org>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.60.0412311158280.27590@dberlin.org>
[not found] ` <20041231184405.GA2182@lucon.org>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.60.0412311451060.6844@dberlin.org>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.60.0412311509360.6844@dberlin.org>
[not found] ` <20041231215010.GA5722@lucon.org>
[not found] ` <20041231215443.GA5853@lucon.org>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.60.0412311656360.6844@dberlin.org>
[not found] ` <20041231220324.GA5987@lucon.org>
2005-01-01 19:15 ` gcc 4.0 " H. J. Lu
2005-01-01 20:09 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2005-01-01 20:50 ` Daniel Berlin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050101200945.GA30989@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=dberlin@dberlin.org \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=hjl@lucon.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox